it
This is all very helpful! And it gives us a lot of good ideas for further
locking down this smart host, should we decide to implement it.
Thanks,
Bryan
).
and from
mail servers sending mail to any domain where we are the final
destination.
common for mail servers.
We are considering setting up an SMTP smart host server for a few
entities that would be allowed to relay through our server. My
question is:
What do you mean smart host? Do you
g mail to any domain where we are the final
> destination.
>
> We are considering setting up an SMTP smart host server for a few
> entities that would be allowed to relay through our server. My
> question is:
>
> Is there any security benefits to creating this smart host as
On 4/8/2015 6:48 PM, Ray Dzek wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a configuration change to make to our postfix relays and I
> want to confirm it will work as intended (before I mis-route email
> for 1,000 people).
>
>
>
> I think I have what is a fairly common Postfix environment –
>
>
>
> Dua
Hi,
I have a configuration change to make to our postfix relays and I want to
confirm it will work as intended (before I mis-route email for 1,000 people).
I think I have what is a fairly common Postfix environment -
Dual instances -
Instance 1 for inbound - AmavisD, Spamassassin, and some oth
Am 09.01.2012 21:48, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 1/9/2012 2:24 PM, Ben Curtis wrote:
>> First off, thanks for the help everyone!
>>
>>> Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly.
>>>
>>> For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS
>>> # openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -st
Am 09.01.2012 18:16, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 1/9/2012 10:19 AM, Ben Curtis wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
>> before, and am at a loss.
>>
>> I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Ho
On 1/9/2012 2:24 PM, Ben Curtis wrote:
> First off, thanks for the help everyone!
>
>> Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly.
>>
>> For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS
>> # openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -starttls smtp
>>
>
> I'm using 587, and this seem
First off, thanks for the help everyone!
>Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly.
>
>For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS
># openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -starttls smtp
>
I'm using 587, and this seemed to functioned just fine from a remote host:
---
On 1/9/2012 10:19 AM, Ben Curtis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
> before, and am at a loss.
>
> I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
> Exchange 2010 (Small Busines
Am 09.01.2012 17:19, schrieb Ben Curtis:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
> before, and am at a loss.
>
> I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
> Exchange 2010 (Small Busines
Hi all,
I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this
before, and am at a loss.
I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from
Exchange 2010 (Small Business Server 2011). My problem is that I can't
get TLS to work. The error m
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/26/2010 7:09 PM:
> I have one last question. Since postfix's header information is most
> meaningful, is there a setting that would allow me to strip all the
> previous header info (in this case exchange's)?
Yes. This was covered somewhat recently on the list, and s
I have one last question. Since postfix's header information is most
meaningful, is there a setting that would allow me to strip all the
previous header info (in this case exchange's)?
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/25/2010 6:06 PM:
On 12/26/10 1:58 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
mouss put forth on 12/26/2010 4:13 AM:
Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound se
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/25/2010 6:06 PM:
> Actually, the original proble reported with the previous post namely
> connection timeout was resolved. After checking tcpdump, I realized
> outgoing smtp port was closed.
>
> But, as it appears, this email was not in vain. I need to use a
> diffe
mouss put forth on 12/26/2010 4:13 AM:
> Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>>> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge
Le 26/12/2010 05:12, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
>>> I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
>>> is on internal edge of the dmz.
>>
>> Bah, you did mention the Exchan
2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>>> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
>>>
>>>> I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
>>>> to send mail out. Specifically, I would like to bypass all of
>>>>
RVER
>
>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>>> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
>>>
>>>> I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
>>>> to send mail out. Specifically, I would li
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
> > is on internal edge of the dmz.
>
> Bah, you did mention the Exchange server and I just missed it. The 587
> is more geared toward MUAs like Outlook and TBi
ant to
relay the mail from _only_ the Exchange server simply have, I think.
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, IP_OF_EXCH_SERVER
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
>>
>>> I am now looking to use the
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
>
>> I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
>>
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
> I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
> to send mail out. Specifically, I would like to bypass all of
> the checks done for incoming mail
If you are referring to user submitted mail to be relayed to the outs
smtp server.
Actually, you configured it as a content_filter between the SMTP server
and the output side of Postfix.
> Once an email is inspected, it is reinjected for
> delivery. I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart
> host, to send mail out. Specifically, I would
looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart
host, to send mail out. Specifically, I would like to bypass all of
the checks done for incoming mail and tightly control the outbound
traffic. How can I accomplish this?
Below, is my main.cf
config_directory = /etc/postfix
local_recipient_maps
Fons van der Beek wrote:
Hello all,
I have a SBS server that has several users from different domains,
receiving mails for several domains on the SBS box is no problem.
The problem is in sending.
Suppose I use postfix as an outgoing smarthost, but this smart host
should rewrite the senders
* Fons van der Beek :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a SBS server that has several users from different domains,
> receiving mails for several domains on the SBS box is no problem.
> The problem is in sending.
>
> Suppose I use postfix as an outgoing smarthost, but this smart host
Hello all,
I have a SBS server that has several users from different domains,
receiving mails for several domains on the SBS box is no problem.
The problem is in sending.
Suppose I use postfix as an outgoing smarthost, but this smart host
should rewrite the senders adress.
e.g.
Exchange
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Replying to myself:
no, it really works now. Maybe I looked at the wrong log entry.
Thank you for your suggestions -- they work!
Glad it worked. You had me worried there for a minute...
--
Noel Jones
Replying to myself:
no, it really works now. Maybe I looked at the wrong log entry.
Thank you for your suggestions -- they work!
eneric.regexp
I have this:
transport_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/transport
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic,
regexp:/etc/postfix/generic_regexp
(I do some canonicalization)
> # transport
> through-smart-host smtp:[smart-host]
> .through-smart-host smtp:[smart.host]
and
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart-host). Of course, j
* RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Use sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
> >
>
> I have done this:
>
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_dependent_relayhost
> smtp_sender_dependent_authentication = yes
>
> What should be the construction of "
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
>> The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
>>
>> My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
RSCL Mumbai wrote:
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all ema
RSCL Mumbai wrote:
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails to their
respective hosts for d
* RSCL Mumbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
> The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
>
> My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
>
> I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails t
Hi
I have setup my first Postfix on Fedora Core 9.
The installation was very simple and the MTA is working fine.
My MailServer is actually a "relay" server for all our group domains.
I need to setup Postfix such that it will forward all emails to their
respective hosts for delivery.
For example
41 matches
Mail list logo
