On 4/26/2010 4:05 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
After working on some other issues. I came back to this spam problem. I
once again do not have the -v. The spam I was looking at came in last
wensday (I disabled the -v for a few weeks now until I can get back to
it) and one difference I noticed is it does
After working on some other issues. I came back to this spam problem.
I once again do not have the -v. The spam I was looking at came in
last wensday (I disabled the -v for a few weeks now until I can get
back to it) and one difference I noticed is it does not have a hold
header on it. It d
On 3/25/2010 4:27 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
I checked a few setting as explained. I have a stupid question and also
my results.
First of all it is not just comming from postini. It once in a while
wonders in from the outside. Not that I know how since all my mx records
points to postini. Just random
On 2010-03-25 Josh Cason wrote:
> First of all it is not just comming from postini. It once in a while
> wonders in from the outside. Not that I know how since all my mx
> records points to postini. Just random junk I suspose.
Your previous log excerpt did not include a full transaction (much less
I checked a few setting as explained. I have a stupid question and
also my results.
First of all it is not just comming from postini. It once in a while
wonders in from the outside. Not that I know how since all my mx
records points to postini. Just random junk I suspose.
The next thing i
On 3/25/2010 12:22 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
Thanks for the help so far. I already posted my config file in the very
first post. However, I will repost it. Plus an additional log file of
the attack. Yes to me it seems like an open relay. As stated before when
I run tests they say closed relay. As for
Thanks for the help so far. I already posted my config file in the
very first post. However, I will repost it. Plus an additional log
file of the attack. Yes to me it seems like an open relay. As stated
before when I run tests they say closed relay. As for reading the
howto's. I have been t
On 2010-03-24 7:24 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
> As I said a person connnects up. (not one of the email users). Just a
> random ip number. Sometimes it is postini (we use postini), aol, etc,
> etc. That sends one message in with mutiple reciepients. Then it sends
> out like say 20 or 30 or 100 messages t
It isn't just aol. It is any isp system that they seem to be spamming.
As I said a person connnects up. (not one of the email users). Just a
random ip number. Sometimes it is postini (we use postini), aol, etc,
etc. That sends one message in with mutiple reciepients. Then it sends
out like
Josh Cason a écrit :
> I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
> great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into our
> system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail addresses
> like aol.com.
so you forward mail to aol and the like? ple
On 2010-03-24 Josh Cason wrote:
> I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
> great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into
> our system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail
> addresses like aol.com.
Check your logs to find out how th
I have two problems. I built a new postfix e-mail system that worked
great for about 1 year. Then I started getting spam that comes into
our system as one msg and is then routed out to mutiple e-mail
addresses like aol.com. I have since update my postfix config file to
block even more spam
12 matches
Mail list logo
