> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>> * Res :
>>
>>> Dovecot by far, for any number of users, we used to use Courier but
>>> found Dovecot had a good %30-%40 performance boost on busy servers, you
>>> could likely get away with one pop/imap server so long as it was decent
>>> hardware
* Res :
> Dovecot by far, for any number of users, we used to use Courier but
> found Dovecot had a good %30-%40 performance boost on busy servers, you
> could likely get away with one pop/imap server so long as it was decent
> hardware.
Same here. This is mainly due to the caches dovecot uses.
* Res :
>> We will install new servers to improve performance in our structure.
>> Currently many accounts receiving more then 5000 msgs./hour.
>>
>> Two MX Postfix, two IMAP servers and more two servers with
>> Spamassassin, Clamav,...
>>
>> Which is the best option of IMAP server to few users
Hi,
We will install new servers to improve performance in our
structure. Currently many accounts receiving more then 5000 msgs./hour.
Two MX Postfix, two IMAP servers and more two servers with
Spamassassin, Clamav,...
Which is the best option of IMAP server to few users and high volume
of
