RE: Separating relay control from other checks

2009-03-23 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Viktor, > > > > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > > > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" > > > > > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and > > may > > > never be) implemented. > > > > :-( > > > > What a shame! I think

Re: Separating relay control from other checks

2009-03-23 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:10:49PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" > > > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and > may > > never be) implemen

RE: Separating relay control from other checks

2009-03-23 Thread Rocco Scappatura
> > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and may > never be) implemented. :-( What a shame! I think that it could be very nice.. rocsca

Re: Separating relay control from other checks

2009-03-23 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:16:45AM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and may never be) implemented. -- Vikt

Separating relay control from other checks

2009-03-23 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hello, I felt interesting the discussion started by mouss in thread "whitelist from spamhaus", and particularly the content of the email: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html written by Viktor. Indeed, I have started since some weeks to use the Postfix SMTP polic