Victor Duchovni:
> Yes.
>
> > 2) Am I accurate in assuming that smtp.receivingdomain.com will see delivery
> > attempts from both IP addresses for mailer.sendingdomain.com and
> > fallbackmailer.sendingdomain.com, and therefore I will need to manage the
> > Sender Reputations of both IPs, make sur
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:52:29PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> We're exploring the possibility of using smtp_fallback_relay as a way to
> offload re-delivery attempts of deferred mails when we send our weekly
> newsletter to 700K+ recipients.
A good idea for mailings of this scale.
> 3) fallba
We're exploring the possibility of using smtp_fallback_relay as a way to
offload re-delivery attempts of deferred mails when we send our weekly
newsletter to 700K+ recipients.
>From the docs at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay,
here's how I understand this would work:
1)
Yes, in fact, I ended up using it.
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 21.12.2010 23:11, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
>> sender reputation query results to message header.
Am 21.12.2010 23:11, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
> sender reputation query results to message header. As it turns out
> opendkim did the trick.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM, mouss wrote:
&
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 05:11:12PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
> sender reputation query results to message header. As it turns out
> opendkim did the trick.
Did you mean "reputation" or "authen
Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
sender reputation query results to message header. As it turns out
opendkim did the trick.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 21/12/2010 19:44, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>>
>> Roman Gelfa
Le 21/12/2010 19:44, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/21/2010 12:29 PM:
Does anyone know of a server/software compatible with postfix that
performs sender reputation query?
You need to be much more specific WRT "sender reputation" Roman. What
_precisely_ are
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Roman Gelfand
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:29 AM
> To: postfix users list
> Subject: Sender Reputation
>
> Does anyone know of a server/
Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/21/2010 12:29 PM:
> Does anyone know of a server/software compatible with postfix that
> performs sender reputation query?
You need to be much more specific WRT "sender reputation" Roman. What
_precisely_ are you asking us to answer?
--
Stan
Does anyone know of a server/software compatible with postfix that
performs sender reputation query?
Thanks in advance
Wietse Venema:
> Stefan Foerster:
> > * Wietse Venema :
> > > This is implemented by specifying FILTER actions with empty next-hop
> > > destinations in access maps or header/body_checks, and by configuring
> > > in master.cf one Postfix SMTP client for each SMTP source IP address,
> > > where each
Stefan Foerster:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > This is implemented by specifying FILTER actions with empty next-hop
> > destinations in access maps or header/body_checks, and by configuring
> > in master.cf one Postfix SMTP client for each SMTP source IP address,
> > where each client has its own "-o myh
* Wietse Venema :
> This is implemented by specifying FILTER actions with empty next-hop
> destinations in access maps or header/body_checks, and by configuring
> in master.cf one Postfix SMTP client for each SMTP source IP address,
> where each client has its own "-o myhostname" and "-o smtp_bind_
Victor Duchovni put forth on 1/17/2010 5:43 PM:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:38:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> According to discussions on the Postfix list there is a legitimate
>> need for such functionality. Until now this requires one Postfix
>> instance per source IP address.
>
> I am
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:38:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> According to discussions on the Postfix list there is a legitimate
> need for such functionality. Until now this requires one Postfix
> instance per source IP address.
I am not entirely convinced the need is "legitimate", as this p
postfix-2.7-20100117 changes the meaning of content filters of the
form "transport:" (note: no next-hop destination) so that this
form can be used to implement sender reputation schemes. Typically,
mail is split into classes, and all mail in class X is sent out
from an SMTP client IP ad
17 matches
Mail list logo