Re: Sender Based Transport Selection

2009-04-23 Thread Harsh Jain
Hey victor, My mails are delivered locally using sendmail. Will this work in this case ? regards, harsh On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Victor Duchovni < victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:01:43AM +0600, Harsh Jain wrote: > > > Hey Victor, > > I am n

Re: Sender Based Transport Selection

2009-04-23 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:01:43AM +0600, Harsh Jain wrote: > Hey Victor, > I am not sure I understand. I have gone through postfix filters but its > still not clear how to achieve this. Are you implying using header_checks ? Whatever lets you distinguish one type of message from another. It

Re: Sender Based Transport Selection

2009-04-23 Thread Harsh Jain
Hey Victor, I am not sure I understand. I have gone through postfix filters but its still not clear how to achieve this. Are you implying using header_checks ? something like /firstem...@infoaxe.net/ FILTER slow: /secondem...@infoaxe.net/ FILTER fast: regards, harsh > Use FILTER if you are

Re: Sender Based Transport Selection

2009-04-23 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:46:50AM +0600, Harsh Jain wrote: > It seems to me that postfix can not use different transports based on the > envelope-sender of the mail. This has poor semantics when some of the recipienst are local. This is why the supported sender based routing modifies only the ne

Sender Based Transport Selection

2009-04-23 Thread Harsh Jain
Hi, It seems to me that postfix can not use different transports based on the envelope-sender of the mail. I basically have two categories of email, and i want different rate controls for each of these categories. Is there a possible way to achieve this ? regards, harsh