On 20/02/16 11:02, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Think like a apartment. Your outer door is of course closed and locked, but
> your inner doors are always open.
We leave it at "agree to disagree".
To me your comparison tells me what the problem is. It also doesn't take
the inhabitants into account.
in Skjöldebrand
Skickat: den 20 februari 2016 10:26
Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: SV: access permissions 101
On 20/02/16 02:05, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Everytime I need multiple processes to access the very same file and those
> processes has interlocks that prevent them from run
On 20/02/16 02:05, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Everytime I need multiple processes to access the very same file and those
> processes has interlocks that prevent them from running as the same user or
> same group, I just "fix" the problem with 666.
>
> That is a thing I ONLY do if I get a permissi
On 02/19/2016 08:05 PM, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>
> Yeah, I agree that actually, only 644 is required on that config
> file. But why get so angry when someone 666's a file to just get
> things working? Its not like a list of banned spam domains is
> something super-sensitive.
>
Maybe this makes
Everytime I need multiple processes to access the very same file and those
processes has interlocks that prevent them from running as the same user or
same group, I just "fix" the problem with 666.
That is a thing I ONLY do if I get a permission error when trying to do
something I want to do wi
