ules for SMTP traffic, which I
> find unlikely. SMTP is TCP/IP like website traffic, IRC traffic, Skype
> traffic, DNS traffic or whatever.
>
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] För Robert Schett
r whatever.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] För Robert Schetterer
Skickat: den 20 februari 2016 13:49
Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Blocking TLDs
Am 20.02.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen:
Am 20.02.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen:
> Why are you people so negative against DISCARD, and wants to use REJECT
Silent discard mail is not allowed in many EU countries, youre the
postman you dont have to deliver bombs ( virus ), you may react on
marketing letters (spam ) by sort them o
l: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Blocking TLDs
On 2016-02-20 00:52, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> 1: REJECT tells the spammer "Hey, your spam got stuck in the spam
> filter. Wanna try again?".
if thay do, so what ?, its not possible for spammers to make remote
administoring on p
On 2016-02-20 00:52, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
1: REJECT tells the spammer "Hey, your spam got stuck in the spam
filter. Wanna try again?".
if thay do, so what ?, its not possible for spammers to make remote
administoring on postfix this would be in vain anyway, and the point on
discard is acc
On 02/19/2016 06:52 PM, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>
> 2: Its just a habit, everytime some process complains of not able to
> access a file, "666" is the universal solution. Of course, this isn't
> recommended in a web hosting setup, but if you're hosting for example
> a mail server for a company, a
1: REJECT tells the spammer "Hey, your spam got stuck in the spam filter. Wanna
try again?".
Better to DISCARD it so the spammer think they got the spam through, then they
won't switch to a new domain.
I don't think anyone ever will receive legitimate mail from any of those spammy
TLDs listed i
