Thanks . This clears my doubt. :-)
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> * Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > > A reasonable setting is:
> > >
> > > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
> > >
> > > This allows any availa
* Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > A reasonable setting is:
> >
> > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
> >
> > This allows any available mechanism except for anonymous, as it is highly
> > exploitable in the context of SMTP. (It's usable in the context of FTP o
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> A reasonable setting is:
>
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
>
> This allows any available mechanism except for anonymous, as it is highly
> exploitable in the context of SMTP. (It's usable in the context of FTP or IMAP
> shared folder access).
>
> Another reason
* punit jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I was going through link
> http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/smtp_auth_mailclients.html
>
> " It appears that clients try authentication methods in the order as
> advertised by the server (e.g., PLAIN ANONYMOUS CRAM-MD5) w
Hi Patrick,
I was going through link
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/smtp_auth_mailclients.html
" It appears that clients try authentication methods in the order as
advertised by the server (e.g., PLAIN ANONYMOUS CRAM-MD5) which means that
if you disable plaintext passwor
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote, at 08/14/2008 08:22 AM:
The order in which mechanisms are listed in $mech_list or in which they are
announced as SMTP capability is irrelevant. The client chooses the "best"
mechanism by it's own logic.
Note that this has become a blessing from a support point of vie
* punit jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a query on SASL mechanism.
>
> I have enabled 3 mechanisms and that can be seen as : -
>
> ehlo localhost
> 250-proxy.test.com
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-SIZE 1024
> 250-VRFY
> 250-ETRN
> 250-STARTTLS
> 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
> 250-AU
Hi All,
I have a query on SASL mechanism.
I have enabled 3 mechanisms and that can be seen as : -
ehlo localhost
250-proxy.test.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 1024
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250
