Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Patrik Båt
On ons 5 feb 2014 16:40:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > >> Maybe check that SASL give a respons, and if not just tmp fail it. or >> someother check. > > The proposed patch is incorrect. Please reply on-list only. > >> --- ../../../postfix

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > Maybe check that SASL give a respons, and if not just tmp fail it. or > someother check. The proposed patch is incorrect. Please reply on-list only. > --- ../../../postfix-2.9.6/src/smtpd/smtpd_sasl_glue.c2011-12-18 > 19:03

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:50:32AM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > >> Hmm, Victor are you sure this works? Setting restrictions to "permit_sasl_authenticated, defer" works when clients don't attempt to authenticate. If a client attempts to authenticate and fails, the client will not send the message.

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Patrik Båt
On ons 5 feb 2014 09:50:32, Patrik Båt wrote: > On ons 5 feb 2014 09:43:52, Patrik Båt wrote: >> On ons 5 feb 2014 09:17:57, Patrik Båt wrote: >>> On tis 4 feb 2014 15:42:04, Patrik Båt wrote: On tis 4 feb 2014 15:36:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +010

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Patrik Båt
On ons 5 feb 2014 09:43:52, Patrik Båt wrote: > On ons 5 feb 2014 09:17:57, Patrik Båt wrote: >> On tis 4 feb 2014 15:42:04, Patrik Båt wrote: >>> On tis 4 feb 2014 15:36:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > When saslauthd crashe

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Patrik Båt
On ons 5 feb 2014 09:17:57, Patrik Båt wrote: > On tis 4 feb 2014 15:42:04, Patrik Båt wrote: >> On tis 4 feb 2014 15:36:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: >>> When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. eg: 535 5

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-05 Thread Patrik Båt
On tis 4 feb 2014 15:42:04, Patrik Båt wrote: > On tis 4 feb 2014 15:36:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: >> >>> When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. >>> eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure >>>

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread Patrik Båt
On tis 4 feb 2014 15:36:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > >> When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. >> eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure >> >> Can I somehow change it to just defer? > > If you

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Patrik B?t wrote: > When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. > eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure > > Can I somehow change it to just defer? If you have a dedicated submission/relay service to which *all* clie

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread LuKreme
On 04 Feb 2014, at 06:57 , Patrik Båt wrote: > When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. Well, first off, why is saslauthd crashing? Fix that. > eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure Are you talking about SASL on submission? because that would not clas

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread Patrik Båt
On tis 4 feb 2014 15:13:03, LuKreme wrote: > > On 04 Feb 2014, at 06:57 , Patrik Båt wrote: > >> When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. > > Well, first off, why is saslauthd crashing? Fix that. saslauthd[33257]: DEBUG: auth_pam: pam_authenticate failed: Memory buffer error

Re: SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 04.02.2014 14:57, schrieb Patrik Båt: > When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. > eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure > > Can I somehow change it to just defer? that makes no sense what do you do with that messages later? how do you authenticate

SASL defer rather then reject

2014-02-04 Thread Patrik Båt
Hello! When saslauthd crashes or beeing stopped, mails are bounced. eg: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: generic failure Can I somehow change it to just defer? // Patrik signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature