Hi,
On Sun, 17.01.2010 at 09:00:13 -0800, Daniel L. Miller
wrote:
> re-invent them or add processing time. Using port 587 is a good
> thought to pre-validate local senders - but I want to support
> verified remote senders as well - so I need a more universal
> solution.
we are doing this - ou
mouss wrote:
Daniel L. Miller a écrit :
I would like to have a policy server checked in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions - but only if a previous permit_* check is
true. Can I do this without coding the check within the policy server?
Right now I have my standard smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
s
Daniel L. Miller a écrit :
> I would like to have a policy server checked in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions - but only if a previous permit_* check is
> true. Can I do this without coding the check within the policy server?
>
> Right now I have my standard smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
> smtpd_re
I would like to have a policy server checked in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions - but only if a previous permit_* check is
true. Can I do this without coding the check within the policy server?
Right now I have my standard smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unk
