> On May 25, 2019, at 12:32 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
>> If you want soft_failure, try "-o soft_fail=yes"
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> soft_bounce = yes
Yes.
--
Viktor.
Greetings, Viktor Dukhovni!
> If you want soft_failure, try "-o soft_fail=yes"
Shouldn't that be
soft_bounce = yes
?
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, May 25, 2019 19:32:05
Sorry for my terrible english...
Greetings, Viktor Dukhovni!
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:38:29AM +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> May 24 08:07:39 mxs postfix/smtp/smtpd[1938]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> mail.regionspb.net[84.204.28.35]: 450 4.7.0 : Recipient
>> address rejected: defer_if_reject requested;
>> from= to= proto=
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:38:29AM +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> May 24 08:07:39 mxs postfix/smtp/smtpd[1938]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mail.regionspb.net[84.204.28.35]: 450 4.7.0 : Recipient
> address rejected: defer_if_reject requested; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
> May 24 10:13:22 mxs p
Andrey Repin:
> Greetings, All!
>
> Can't seems to grasp the origin of the issue.
> If I send the mail to the same addresses myself, it is coming through, so is
> much of the other mail traffic.
Perhaps the origin is that *you* are not sending email from
84.204.28.35.
Wietse
> info@ is
Greetings, All!
Can't seems to grasp the origin of the issue.
If I send the mail to the same addresses myself, it is coming through, so is
much of the other mail traffic.
info@ is virtual, bulk of the mail coming its way, no problem.
vera@ is real local address.
If I grep similar entries in the
