On 4/8/2009, Patrick Ben Koetter (p...@state-of-mind.de) wrote:
>>> I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
>> The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
>> support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a
>> lot of hacking...
> This will change in Mail
* Charles Marcus :
> On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> > I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
>
> The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
> support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
> of hacking...
This will change in Ma
On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
of hacking...
Other than that, its great...
--
Best regards,
Ch
Guy a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
> having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
> Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
> postfix/maildrop
postfix is MLM agnostic.
> or one that people find particularly nice
Guy wrote:
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
I found mailman was
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
--
Don't just do something...sit t
