Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Practice:
>
> Actual implementation will depend on your size and business model.
> Here (private network with ~1000 users), we tag+pass spam up to some
> SA score, higher scoring spam is discarded. Viruses are always
> discarded. Discarded mail
Ian R. Justman wrote:
Hi, all.
I was curious what best practices are nowadays for those who use
post-queue filtering if they elect not to keep
spam/virused/bad-attachment-laden messages, something which I found
myself having to do owing to my previous message (there's no way to
selectively
Hi, all.
I was curious what best practices are nowadays for those who use
post-queue filtering if they elect not to keep
spam/virused/bad-attachment-laden messages, something which I found
myself having to do owing to my previous message (there's no way to
selectively disable pre-queueing on
