On 2012-07-28 Andrea Gozzi wrote:
> I currently have a postfix setup with virtual users on a mysql database
> and dovecot as lda.
> I wanted to implement the "+" separator to route specific messages to a
> custom destination folder (within the account).
>
> Can I do that directly in postfix or sho
Hi guys,
I currently have a postfix setup with virtual users on a mysql database
and dovecot as lda.
I wanted to implement the "+" separator to route specific messages to a
custom destination folder (within the account).
Can I do that directly in postfix or should I create ad-hoc rules in
dovecot
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:08, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> In situations where mail is forwarded outside the environment that
> supports the local recipient delimiter (e.g. Postfix->Exchange):
>
> I set:
>
> propagate_unmatched_extesion = canonical
>
t maybe the same MTA software). The
> catch is that domainA uses one recipient delimiter character (for
> example '+') while domainC uses a different recipient delimiter
> character (for example '-'). DomainB uses the same as domainA. So
> b...@domaina forwards
I don't see any easy fix to this.
A user has email forwarded from their address at domainA to their
address at domainB and also to their address at domainC, each running
on different mail servers (but maybe the same MTA software). The
catch is that domainA uses one recipient delimiter char
On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:30 PM, mouss wrote:
== virtual_alias_maps:
/^(joe|jim|jane)-(.*)@(example\.net|example\.com)$/$1...@$3
this converts joe-...@example.com to joe+...@example.com
If you don't want to generate the file (and update it when you add
users), you can use mysql or friends.
Erick Calder wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Erick Calder:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>
>
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand...
On Sep 26, 2009, at 0:08, Barney Desmond
wrote:
LuKreme: sure, it's easy to describe the generally-expected behaviour,
but I suspect Wietse's point is that you're welcome to write the patch
and make sure nothing breaks. *grin*
Aye, there's the rub.
2009/9/26 Erick Calder :
> oh, I think i get it. if server A is just relaying to server B, it will get
> e/j...@arix.com and hand e+j...@arix.com to B. I'm not sure I understand
> how that would break the mail (since e+j...@arix.com) is valid and will
> still be received. of course, if B is conf
On Sep 25, 2009, at 15:30, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
What if one address matches more than one element in your delimiter
set?
Only match on the first delimited found, seems like the best idea.
user.extension-word+...@example.com
If the delimited is + then the extension is e
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
I'm not sure I understand... perhaps we're speaking of 2 different
things.
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Erick Calder:
> >> On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >>> Erick Calder:
> >>>
> this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
> feature but my only complaint is that many
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address...
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Erick Calder:
> >
> >> this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
> >> feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
> >> sign
> >> in an e-mail address... is there a way to have
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address... is there a way to have a character bag work
as
the delimiter?
Erick Calder:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Patrick Ben Koetter:
> >> Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a
> >> standard
> >> that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just
On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a
standard
that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just
appear one
day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
An
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard
> that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one
> day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
>
> Anybody knows?
As far as I know, the b
Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a standard
that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just appear one
day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
Anybody knows?
p...@rick
--
All technical questions asked privately wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
