On 2022-01-10 at 23:00:43 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:00:43 +0100)
Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch>
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ?
No.
policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail
I have pasted full header here:
On 2022-01-11 12:54, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
misconfiguratons.
I am quite happy to ban mis
On 2022-01-11 12:51, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
you mean SPF fail in general
On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
diffrent spf domain
On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
misconfiguratons.
On 11.01.22 12:54, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I am quite happy to ban misc
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 12:51:54 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> > On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
> >>
> >>What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> >>(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
> >
> >Forwardin
> On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
misconfiguratons.
I am quite happy to ban misconfigured / misbehaved servers.
Shouldn't l
> On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
you mean SPF fail in general?
I am asking specifically for "soft fail"
Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze:
>
> What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
> (non-spam) would generate soft fail?
Forwarding.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know:
On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ?
The point of softfail is NOT to reject those mails - that's wht soft means.
policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail
I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.io/2/AABg5vIYEw
W
On 2022-01-11 07:55, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
sorry, the previous link expired. Here is the header again:
https://ctxt.io/2/AABgetU0Fw
www-data@
co.uk
amazon.ch
good point its softfailed
what would one do on reply
> On 2022-01-11 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
Hello,
is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ?
policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail
I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.io/2/AABg5vIYEw
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(
On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:00:43 PM EST Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ?
>
>policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail
>
> I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.io/2/AABg5vIYEw
>
> Wha
Hello,
is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ?
policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail
I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.io/2/AABg5vIYEw
What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender
(non-spam) would generate soft fail?
14 matches
Mail list logo
