Re: Re : Re: issue with content filter

2015-09-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 01:58:27PM +0200, POSTFIX MAIL wrote: > The only difference between the 2 tests is the debug_peer_list parameter > (postfix, content filter, filter, message are the same). > > If the filter is buggy, the result should be the same but this is not the > case here. So, I woul

Re: Re : Re: issue with content filter

2015-09-15 Thread Wietse Venema
POSTFIX MAIL: > The only difference between the 2 tests is the debug_peer_list > parameter (postfix, content filter, filter, message are the same). The difference is that turning on debug_peer_list changes the timing of Postfix SMTP client commands. If that has any observable effect then the conte

Re : Re: issue with content filter

2015-09-15 Thread POSTFIX MAIL
The only difference between the 2 tests is the debug_peer_list parameter (postfix, content filter, filter, message are the same). If the filter is buggy, the result should be the same but this is not the case here. So, I would like to understand why the behaviour is different once I enable debu

Re : Re: issue with content filter

2015-09-14 Thread POSTFIX MAIL
Yes, I know. But the issue is not here but on the fact the mail is lost when debug is disabled: * No Debug mode, mail is not in deferred queue while the content filter close the connection: ... relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, conn_use=4, delay=0.15, delays=0.15/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (