On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:41:04AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > Scalability. One postscreen process can reject more zombies
> > than 1000+ smtpd processes.
>
> Impressive! I did not realize that it was that efficient.
This is easy, one smtpd(8) process handles one connection, on the other
hand, one
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:10:58 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> Daniel Bromberg:
> > With an emphasis towards handling larger loads in the future, I am
> > trying to get a grip on the advantages provided by postscreen as
> > opposed to letting smtpd do the filtering "in situ."
>
> Scalabi
Daniel Bromberg:
> With an emphasis towards handling larger loads in the future, I am
> trying to get a grip on the advantages provided by postscreen as opposed
> to letting smtpd do the filtering "in situ."
Scalability. One postscreen process can reject more zombies
than 1000+ smtpd processes.
