On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:06:51PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:45 PM, Tomas Habarta wrote:
> >
> > 6663]: recvmsg(128, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\0",
> > iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CTRUNC}, 0) = 1
> > [7141]: re
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:45 PM, Tomas Habarta wrote:
>
> 6663]: recvmsg(128, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\0",
> iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CTRUNC}, 0) = 1
> [7141]: recvmsg(128, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\0",
> iov_l
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 01:22:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Tomas Habarta:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ask about the following encountered during selinux testing:
> > * currently running 3.5.8 self-compiled (no vendor packaging), centos8
> > (selinux disabled)
> > * target platform ce
Tomas Habarta:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask about the following encountered during selinux testing:
> * currently running 3.5.8 self-compiled (no vendor packaging), centos8
> (selinux disabled)
> * target platform centos8 (same configuration but selinux enabled)
Best bet is to strace the tls
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 06:36:10PM +0200, Tomas Habarta wrote:
> selinux enabled:
> transaction fails with:
>
> tlsproxy[23256]: warning: tlsp_get_fd_event: receive remote SMTP peer file
> descriptor: Success
> tlsproxy[23256]: TLS handshake failed for service=smtp peer=[10.25.41.35]:25
> tlspro
