[pfx] Re: test relay

Adam Weremczuk via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-02-19 15:26: Now, how do I restrict this relay to only be used by one specific LAN address or one specific LAN subnet? All other SMTP traffic should continue using the defaults already in place. make another smtp in master.cf mail.example.org

[pfx] Re: Test Post - Please Ignore

duluxoz via Postfix-users writes: > Sorry Everyone, but I need to test if my posts are going through > > Please ignore (or feel free to send me a confirmation) > > Cheers > > Dulux-Oz Looks good. But Subject's prefix [pfx] or [P-U] are too rich. Just it is minority feedback... Sincerely, --

[pfx] Re: Test Post - Please Ignore

On 2023-03-24 10:49, Antonio Leding via Postfix-users wrote: Got it… Also, just an FYI - But I’ve always been able to confirm my posts are working properly by reviewing the list archive. Posts seem to appear almost as fast as received by the list members so typically a good way to verify eve

[pfx] Re: Test Post - Please Ignore

Got it… Also, just an FYI - But I’ve always been able to confirm my posts are working properly by reviewing the list archive. Posts seem to appear almost as fast as received by the list members so typically a good way to verify everything is working ok… Just my .02… https://www.mail-archiv

[pfx] Re: Test Post - Please Ignore

duluxoz via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-23 06:41: Sorry Everyone, but I need to test if my posts are going through +1 Please ignore (or feel free to send me a confirmation) if that going through ? :) ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-u

Re: Test E-Mail

Maurizio Caloro skrev den 2018-03-05 22:45: I think this email will never arivve I have send in the past so meny Question but no are displayed. Possible i'am banned? why is you dkim sign 3 times on same mail ? and dmarc failed

Re: Test E-Mail

On 3/5/2018 3:45 PM, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > I think this email will never arivve > >   > > I have send in the past so meny Question but no are displayed. > >   > > Possible i’am banned? > >   > Yes, it works. Be aware some mail systems suppress showing your own posts to mailing lists. Gm

Re: test address expansion with LDAP mapping

On 11/3/2016 1:12 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > I found a way to test the expansion of normal .db maps: > > postmap -q testuser 'postconf -h virtual_alias_maps' > > however, it doesn't seem to work with LDAP maps. Is there a way to > test those as well? > > Steve Yes, it works with LDAP maps. W

Re: test address expansion with LDAP mapping

On Nov 03, 2016, at 14.12, Stephen Ingram wrote: > > I found a way to test the expansion of normal .db maps: > > postmap -q testuser 'postconf -h virtual_alias_maps' > > however, it doesn't seem to work with LDAP maps. Is there a way to test those > as well? it's worked as documented for me,

Re: Test DANE

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:46 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > Isn't generally better to use a new private key? Not if doing so makes it impractical to maintain correct TLSA records. Specifically, if certificate renewals are frequent and automated, it becomes difficult to pre-stage new keys and assoc

Re: Test DANE

On 06/06/2016 07:46 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Alexandre Ellert wrote: I�ve juste enable DANE and https://dane.sys4.de is green when I test my domain numeezy.com . Also postfix SMTP client says "Verified T

Re: Test DANE

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > > I did some further research. It seems that validns does not like this > > construct, because it insists that TLSA records are 'properly prefixed' > > (i.e. with a port and service prefix, see [1]). > > Insists, as a policy check, w

Re: Test DANE

On 06-06-16 17:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > >> I have been playing around with the dane check tool from sys4 too, and >> it seems it doesn't support the nice CNAME trick shown in >> https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/please-avoid-3-0

Re: Test DANE

On 06-06-16 20:26, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 06-06-16 17:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: >> >>> I have been playing around with the dane check tool from sys4 too, and >>> it seems it doesn't support the nice CNAME trick shown in >>> https:/

Re: Test DANE

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > I have been playing around with the dane check tool from sys4 too, and > it seems it doesn't support the nice CNAME trick shown in > https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/please-avoid-3-0-1-and-3-0-2-dane-tlsa-records-with-le-certificat

Re: Test DANE

> Le 6 juin 2016 à 16:46, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit : > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Alexandre Ellert wrote: > >> I�ve juste enable DANE and https://dane.sys4.de >> is green when I test my domain numeezy.com . Also >> postfix SMTP clien

Re: Test DANE

Hi, I have been playing around with the dane check tool from sys4 too, and it seems it doesn't support the nice CNAME trick shown in https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/please-avoid-3-0-1-and-3-0-2-dane-tlsa-records-with-le-certificates/7022 The tool does not seem to follow the CNAME pointer, and

Re: Test DANE

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Alexandre Ellert wrote: > I�ve juste enable DANE and https://dane.sys4.de > is green when I test my domain numeezy.com . Also > postfix SMTP client says "Verified TLS connection established to > mail-in-1.numee

Re: test

try again with a subject matching the topic

Re: Test TLS DANE Records

* Viktor Dukhovni [2014-05-08 02:09]: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:14:09AM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > > I published TLS DANE Records for my mailserver and now I am wondering > > if there is a way to verify that these records are okay/matching the > > cert. Is there a tool/site where I

Re: Test TLS DANE Records

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:14:09AM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > I published TLS DANE Records for my mailserver and now I am wondering > if there is a way to verify that these records are okay/matching the > cert. Is there a tool/site where I can test this? I suppose it would > be possible w

Re: test only. do not read.

On Tue, December 11, 2012 8:16 pm, Noel Jones wrote: > On 12/11/2012 2:02 PM, Gary Baribault wrote: >> Oh no!! Your curiosity got me to read it too .. countdown has >> started to armageddon, 10 days and counting!! >> > Somehow, Armageddon seems wrong for the Mayan end-of-time. > https://www.youtube

Re: test only. do not read.

I thought it was going to be the Alpacalypse! http://www.fodrizzle.com/2012/03/06/alpacalypse/ On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > Somehow, Armageddon seems wrong for the Mayan end-of-time. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFlaaa8fGoE > > -- Noel Jones > > On 12/11/2012 2:0

Re: test only. do not read.

Somehow, Armageddon seems wrong for the Mayan end-of-time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFlaaa8fGoE -- Noel Jones On 12/11/2012 2:02 PM, Gary Baribault wrote: > Oh no!! Your curiosity got me to read it too .. countdown has > started to armageddon, 10 days and counting!! > > Gary Baribault >

Re: test only. do not read.

Oh no!! Your curiosity got me to read it too .. countdown has started to armageddon, 10 days and counting!! Gary Baribault Courriel: g...@baribault.net GPG Key: 0x685430d1 Signature: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3 6C35 C6B7 6854 30D1 On 12/11/2012 11:25 AM, Evan Platt wrote: > Crud. I read it. Doe

Re: test only. do not read.

Crud. I read it. Does that initiate armageddon? :) On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > test only. > -- > Linux Counter # 353844 > https://linuxcounter.net/user/**353844.html > >

Re: Test postfix on another server

Zitat von Tolga : Hi, Is there some solution to test postfix on another server without changing MX? I'm in the phase of switching servers. Regards, Simply use the MUA of your choice and point it to the new MX port 25. You machine should not be included in mynetworks of course. Regard

Re: Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

Daniel Bromberg: > The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I > tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant > clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one using > StrongMail -- surprise, surprise a

Re: Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:47:45 -0500 Daniel Bromberg articulated: > The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I > tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant > clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one > using StrongMail

Filter based on invalid space WAS Re: test submission on 587

The discussion over the invalid space syntax got me thinking, so I tracked my SMTP traffic for about 45 minutes. The only non-compliant clients were clear spammers, save for two gray-area clients, one using StrongMail -- surprise, surprise a purveyor of mass marketi

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 12:53 PM, Daniel Bromberg wrote: On 2/28/2011 12:25 PM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. 250 example.com AUTH login MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":".

Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:53:39PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > Obviously my > example was from a Postfix server, and obviously it worked. So I have a > little trouble with "wrong". Sure, but for posterity the list archives can reasonably steer future readers away from incorrect (even if tol

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 12:25 PM, Claus Assmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. 250 example.com AUTH login MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":". RCPT TO: See above. This is at least somewh

Re: test submission on 587

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > HELO example.com Wrong. If you want to use extensions, you have to use EHLO. > 250 example.com > AUTH login > MAIL FROM: Wrong. See the RFC, no space after ":". > RCPT TO: See above.

Re: test submission on 587

# openssl s_client -connect smtp.example.com:465 220 smtp.example.com ESMTP Postfix HELO example.com 250 example.com AUTH login 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 [the base64 encoding of "Username:" ZGFuaWVsQGJhc2V6ZW4uY29t [base64 encoding of "dan...@basezen.com"] 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 [and of "Password:"] [base64

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: jeffrey j donovan: Thanks I guess blew past that,.. okay so just kill the session and use a client. I thought i would be able to then send or type a test message like MAIL FROM: soandso -j You can ( openssl s_client -connect host:port provid

Re: test submission on 587

jeffrey j donovan: > Thanks > I guess blew past that,.. okay so just kill the session and use > a client. I thought i would be able to then send or type a test > message like MAIL FROM: soandso > -j You can ( openssl s_client -connect host:port provided that you avoid the R and Q chara

Re: test submission on 587

On Feb 28, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > On 2/28/2011 9:13 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: >> If the port requires TLS: >>> $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 >>> helo client.example.com >>> mail from: >>> etc. >>> >>> Otherwise: >>> >>> $ telnet host 587 >>> h

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/28/2011 9:13 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: If the port requires TLS: $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 helo client.example.com mail from: etc. Otherwise: $ telnet host 587 helo client.example.com mail from: etc. Wietse thank you all looks like Im working

Re: test submission on 587

On Feb 27, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > jeffrey j donovan: >> greetings >> how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? >> >> I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. >> Those that have verizon need to use 587 >> I want to watch each ste

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/27/2011 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Noel Jones: $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 helo client.example.com mail from: Caution: s_client uses R and Q for itself, so send lower case commands (rcpt to and quit). Wietse I believe "r" and "q" are reserved a

Re: test submission on 587

Noel Jones: > $ openssl s_client -quiet -starttls smtp -connect host:587 > helo client.example.com > mail from: > >>> > >>> Caution: s_client uses R and Q for itself, so send lower case commands > >>> (rcpt to and quit). > >>> > >>> Wietse > >> > >> I believe "r" and "q" are reserv

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/27/2011 4:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Noel Jones: On 2/27/2011 3:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: jeffrey j donovan: greetings how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. Those that have v

Re: test submission on 587

Noel Jones: > On 2/27/2011 3:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Wietse Venema: > >> jeffrey j donovan: > >>> greetings > >>> how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? > >>> > >>> I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. > >>> Those that have verizon ne

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/27/2011 3:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: jeffrey j donovan: greetings how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. Those that have verizon need to use 587 I want to watch each step through

Re: test submission on 587

Wietse Venema: > jeffrey j donovan: > > greetings > > how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? > > > > I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. > > Those that have verizon need to use 587 > > I want to watch each step through so that i can make su

Re: test submission on 587

* jeffrey j donovan : > greetings > how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? > > I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. > Those that have verizon need to use 587 I want to watch each step through so > that i can make sure I have a clean path. If

Re: test submission on 587

On 2/27/2011 3:21 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: greetings how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? # telnet localhost 587 if you get a greeting from postfix, then postfix is listening. Good. If you require STARTTLS encryption, you can test that with # openssl s_client -conne

Re: test submission on 587

jeffrey j donovan: > greetings > how can i test submission to port 587 from command line ? > > I am setting up a relay for my some users to use when they are off site. > Those that have verizon need to use 587 > I want to watch each step through so that i can make sure I have a clean path. If t

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

Ok, sorry. Posting in plain text now. I'm using Cyberguard firewall & I heard it's stateful. It's not managed by me but by the network/security guys. So by permitting SMTP from those selected domains' SMTP gateways to my postfix server is not sufficient even if I only need to receive incoming m

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:15:21 +0800 sunhux G articulated: > Does my firewall need to permit SMTP outgoing or just incoming is > sufficient? Please don't top post. If you are unfamiliar with that term, Google for it. While you are at it, could you please post in plain ASCII format. There is no nee

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

You're right, there's one master postfix process locking it even though "postfix status" reported postfix is down. Killed it & now postifx could start & I'm beginning to get bounced mails notifications (shown below ***) chroot is disabled & I've whitelisted the sending domains Ran tcpdump nohup

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

On 2/16/2011 10:21 PM, sunhux G wrote: Sorry for the lack of info in earlier post. Think the main issue is I can't even start up postfix : # postfix set-permissions [root@etc]# postfix start postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system [root@ etc]# postfix reload postfix/postfix-sc

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

Sorry for the lack of info in earlier post. Think the main issue is I can't even start up postfix : # postfix set-permissions [root@etc]# postfix start postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system [root@ etc]# postfix reload postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is no

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:36:31 +0800 sunhux G articulated: > Just set up postfix & it's running on my RHES 4.2 box. > > Immediately after postfix is up, I test sending emails from a > permitted domain > (ahhh, on this postfix server's domain firewall, we even have a > firewall rule > which permit

Re: test emails did not arrive in postfix server (no indication in maillog )

sunhux G: > maillog:Feb 15 13:43:20 hostname sendmail[7688]: NOQUEUE: > SYSERR(recipient_id): can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied That is a SENDMAIL error message, not a POSTFIX error message. Wietse

Re: Test e-mailservice

Cameron Smith wrote: Fixed! The solution was to set in the mail servers: relayhost = your.server.com All the instructions when setting up behind a firewall seemed to say leave that at relayhost = but adding my gateway IP makes it work so I am happy :) Yes, that i

Re: Test e-mailservice

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Phillip Smith wrote: > >> 2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : >> >>> I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined >>> with >>> NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> NRPE allows you to connect to t

Re: Test e-mailservice

Phillip Smith wrote: 2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. +1 NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute any command on the local system, returning the re

Re: Test e-mailservice

2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar : > I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with > NRPE to monitor all my servers and services. +1 NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute any command on the local system, returning the result to the Nagios se

Re: Test e-mailservice

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote: > Hi, > > Of course I don't want this to happen again in the future. How do people > test their mail server periodically? So far we use webmin which tries to > connect to port 25, 110 and 143 and checks if the greeting is correct. If > one

RE: Test e-mailservice

> To: Peter Sørensen > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: RE: Test e-mailservice > > Hi Peter, > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:08:34 +0100, Peter Sørensen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 >> minute

RE: Test e-mailservice

...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik Sent: 11. november 2009 11:31 To: Peter Sørensen Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: RE: Test e-mailservice Hi Peter, On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:08:34 +0100, Peter Sørensen wrote: > Hi, > > We have a server ou

RE: Test e-mailservice

Hi Peter, On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:08:34 +0100, Peter Sørensen wrote: > Hi, > > We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 > minutes to > a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which > means that > it will bounce the mail back to the sender. >

Re: Test e-mailservice

2009/11/11 Martijn de Munnik : > remote host. Does anybody use a check which checks the complete mail loop? > I was thinking of sending a mail from a remote host (with webmin) to a test > mail account and see if I can download the mail with imap and then with pop > which removes the mail. The test

RE: Test e-mailservice

Hi, We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 minutes to a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which means that it will bounce the mail back to the sender. We use this to document a baseline. When sending we generate a Uniq Message-id - sa

RE: Test e-mailservice

>-Original Message- >From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] >On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik >Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Subject: Test e-mailservice > >Does anybody have such a test setup? > >Thanks, >M

Re: test

On 18-Aug-2009, at 07:42, Hilel New wrote: I can't submit to this list LIES! -- When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?

Re: test

On 8/18/2009 9:42 AM, Hilel New wrote: > I can't submit to this list You just did... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: Test mysql virtual_mailbox_maps?

On 10/10/2008 8:21 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> Is there a simple way to test the returned value of a mysql based >> virtual mailbox map from the command line using the postconf command or >> something similar? > man postmap (option -q) I'm blind... thanks Ralf... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: Test mysql virtual_mailbox_maps?

* Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Googling didn't reveal the answer (I probably didn't hit the right terms)... > > Is there a simple way to test the returned value of a mysql based > virtual mailbox map from the command line using the postconf command or > something similar? man