Re: smtp_tls*_protocols and !TLSv1

2021-07-02 Thread Bill Cole
On 2021-07-02 at 10:04:29 UTC-0400 (Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:04:29 +0200) Marek Kozlowski is rumored to have said: But on the other hand it's hard to believe than some servers with a good reputation (according to https://talosintelligence.com) of reputable American universities still don't support T

Re: smtp_tls*_protocols and !TLSv1

2021-07-02 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) On 7/2/21 3:56 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 03:14:58PM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote: It looks like '!TLSv1' is seen as something like "!TLSv1.x" ("no TLS 1.x at all") rather than "!TLSv1.0". Yes it is a stupid supposition but I cannot think of any ot

Re: smtp_tls*_protocols and !TLSv1

2021-07-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 03:14:58PM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote: It looks like '!TLSv1' is seen as something like "!TLSv1.x" ("no TLS 1.x at all") rather than "!TLSv1.0". Yes it is a stupid supposition but I cannot think of any other explanation. Is it possible? On 02.07.21

Re: smtp_tls*_protocols and !TLSv1

2021-07-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 03:14:58PM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote: > It looks like '!TLSv1' is seen as something like > "!TLSv1.x" ("no TLS 1.x at all") rather than "!TLSv1.0". Yes it is a stupid > supposition but I cannot think of any other explanation. Is it possible? No, !TLSv