On 2011-08-12 01:37, Troy Piggins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:02:21AM +1000, Troy Piggins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead:
/(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com
Read http://www.postf
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:02:21AM +1000, Troy Piggins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead:
>>
>> /(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com
>>
>> Read http://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html, sectio
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2011-08-10 Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> > On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
> > It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead:
> >
> > /(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com
> >
> > Read http://www.postfix.org/p
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
> >1. Could you please confirm that the pattern between the slashes is just the
> >sender's address that we're trying to match?
>
> sender_bcc_maps matches the envelope sender address.
>
>
On 2011-08-10 Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
>> 2. Can you recommend a better or more elegant solution to the second
>> part of the table with the /us...@mydomain.com/ etc? I tried using
>> something like this:
>>
>> /(user1)@mydomain.com/ \1_s...@mydomain.
On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
Hi there, I have a few questions about sender_bcc_maps.
Until recently I have been using these to archive sent mail with a hash table
like this:
us...@mydomain.com user1_s...@mydomain.com
and some procmail rules took messages sent to user1_s...@mydom
