On Sunday, June 07, 2009 at 10:28 CEST,
Mike Robinson wrote:
[...]
> I'd be interested in knowing what's wrong with reusing the transport
> maps in the way that I have?
What would happen if you'd add some other domain to your transport
table? Say, hotmail.com in order to resolve a delivery
On Sunday 07 June 2009 09:14:24 mouss wrote:
>
> maybe be because you forgot to put that domain under relay_domains.
>
Ah, right, yes. Thanks!
>
> you don't have permit_mynetworks here. and btw, the order of your checks
> is dubious.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_r
Mike Robinson a écrit :
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Thanks for replying.
>
>> If that is the case, why isn't mydestination empty? You have emptied
>> local_recipient_maps, but this means that all addresses are accepted
>> (and then possibly bounced, which is bad).
>>
>
> Because I was getting messages in
Hi Magnus,
Thanks for replying.
>
> If that is the case, why isn't mydestination empty? You have emptied
> local_recipient_maps, but this means that all addresses are accepted
> (and then possibly bounced, which is bad).
>
Because I was getting messages in the logs like this, and
/var/spool/cl
On Saturday, June 06, 2009 at 16:24 CEST,
Mike Robinson wrote:
> We have a server on the internet which provides spam filtering and a
> couple of other bits and bobs.
>
> Spam filtering is by postgrey, amavis, clamav and spamassassin. There
> are no local recipients,
If that is the case, w
