Re: reject_rbl_client leaky?

2016-01-07 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/7/2016 2:19 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Thursday, January 07, 2016 9:06 PM +0100 lutz.niede...@gmx.net > wrote: > >> >> >> postfix version 2.9.3-2.1 on debian >> >> Hi! >> >> I found something really strange. Maybe someone can explain this >> to me. >> >> reject_rbl_client docu say

Re: reject_rbl_client leaky?

2016-01-07 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, January 07, 2016 9:06 PM +0100 lutz.niede...@gmx.net wrote: postfix version 2.9.3-2.1 on debian Hi! I found something really strange. Maybe someone can explain this to me. reject_rbl_client docu says "... If no "=d.d.d.d" is specified, reject the request when the reversed c

Re: reject_rbl_client applied to prior hosts in delivery chain?

2015-07-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/3/2015 10:04 PM, Jim Garrison wrote: > I use > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, > reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, > > which I find catches about 98% of SPAM. > > I also receive mail at an address that is a forwar

Re: reject_rbl_client syntax problem: fatal: RBL reply error: missing "]" character

2012-12-12 Thread martijn.list
On 12/12/2012 01:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 12/11/2012 2:03 AM, martijn.list wrote: I guess in practice hardly no one will use it in this form but since I'm working on a web gui on which users can enter some RBL syntax I had to check what formats are accepted or not. Then you need to read

Re: reject_rbl_client syntax problem: fatal: RBL reply error: missing "]" character

2012-12-12 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 12/11/2012 2:03 AM, martijn.list wrote: > I guess in practice hardly no one will use it in this form but since I'm > working on a web gui on which users can enter some RBL syntax I had to > check what formats are accepted or not. Then you need to read the RFC here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/r

Re: reject_rbl_client syntax problem: fatal: RBL reply error: missing "]" character

2012-12-11 Thread martijn.list
On 12/11/2012 04:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 12/10/2012 2:38 AM, martijn.list wrote: It's probably my misunderstanding on the reject_rbl_client syntax No, it's your misunderstanding of the dnsbl reply syntax. reject_rbl_client example.com=[127;128].0.0.1 I use this as a restriction in sm

Re: reject_rbl_client syntax problem: fatal: RBL reply error: missing "]" character

2012-12-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 12/10/2012 2:38 AM, martijn.list wrote: > It's probably my misunderstanding on the reject_rbl_client syntax No, it's your misunderstanding of the dnsbl reply syntax. > reject_rbl_client example.com=[127;128].0.0.1 > > I use this as a restriction in smtpd_recipient_restrictions: > > smtpd_rec

Re: reject_rbl_client

2010-08-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > Indeed. And that's actually documented http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html Although the above example shows three RBL lookups (lines 4-6), Postfix will only do a single DNS query, so it does not affect the performance. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | A

Re: reject_rbl_client

2010-08-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Vasya Pupkin : > Hello. > > I wonder, how postfix handles multiple entries like this: > > reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2, > reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.4, > > Will it try to lookup address every time, No > or it is smart and will us

Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?

2009-06-10 Thread Noel Jones
mouss wrote: Harakiri a écrit : --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: From: Ralf Hildebrandt Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file? To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM * Harakiri : Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a

Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?

2009-06-10 Thread mouss
Harakiri a écrit : > > > --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >> From: Ralf Hildebrandt >> Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file? >> To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM >> * Harakiri : &

Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?

2009-06-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Harakiri : > > Use a makefile to assemble main.cf from parts > > How should that work if i just have unison/rsync between a few servers and > they only sync each other - there is no option to execute make everytime Simply run "make" in the directory every minute. Or use incrond -- Ralf Hild

Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?

2009-06-10 Thread Harakiri
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > From: Ralf Hildebrandt > Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file? > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM > * Harakiri : > > > > Is it possible to specify the blackhole serv

Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?

2009-06-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Harakiri : > > Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a separate file? I > only found the option, that you specify reject_rbl_client in the > main.cf multiple times. My problem is that i have a cluster of postfix > servers and settings like transport map and relay domains are all in

Re: reject_rbl_client in hash

2009-02-07 Thread richard lucassen
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:48:27 -0500 Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org > Wietse answered the main question, however dsbl.org is gone. > Recommend to remove it from all configs to prevent breakage in the > future. I know, I just played with the config of a very

Re: reject_rbl_client in hash

2009-02-06 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
richard lucassen wrote: > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org Wietse answered the main question, however dsbl.org is gone. Recommend to remove it from all configs to prevent breakage in the future. Brian

Re: reject_rbl_client in hash

2009-02-06 Thread richard lucassen
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:37:09 -0500 (EST) wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > richard lucassen: > > Apparently, this: > > > > smtpd_client_restrictions = > > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net > > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org > > reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl > > The above

Re: reject_rbl_client in hash

2009-02-06 Thread Wietse Venema
richard lucassen: > Apparently, this: > > smtpd_client_restrictions = > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org > reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl The above does RBL lookups (as requested by reject_rbl_client). > replaced by this: > > smtpd_client_restrictio

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-04 Thread Rajkumar S
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:37 PM, mouss wrote: > Remove the "defer" keyword. Return >"450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds" > with no "defer" before it. Thanks, that finally did the trick :) raj

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread mouss
Rajkumar S a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss wrote: >> just use: >> 450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds > > Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction > `450' after `defer' is ignored Remove the "defer" keyword. Return "450 4.7.1 Greylis

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Rajkumar S wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss wrote: >> just use: >> 450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds > > Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction > `450' after `defer' is ignored > > btw, I am using postfix debi

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread Rajkumar S
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss wrote: > just use: > 450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction `450' after `defer' is ignored btw, I am using postfix debian package version 2.5.5-1.1 in Debian Lenny :(

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread Rajkumar S
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss wrote: > just use: > 450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds Thanks! raj

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread Rajkumar S
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:47 PM, mouss wrote: >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:9997, >> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org >> >> Greylisting server returns defer_if_permit to defer a mail. My >> objective is to lookup only those domains in

Re: reject_rbl_client after check_policy_service

2009-01-02 Thread mouss
Rajkumar S a écrit : > Hi, > > I have a smtpd_recipient_restrictions section as follows: > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_unknown_sender_domain, > permit_mynetworks, > reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_non_fqdn_hostname, > reject_invalid_hostname,