Victor Duchovni schrieb:
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Perhaps it is because software does not grow on trees and
actually needs to be created first?
Hey - no offense, we're in the same business! This wa
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:45:53PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jan P. Kessler:
> > Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> > > The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
> > > above it.
> > >
> >
> > That makes sense, of course.
> >
> > Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_rec
Jan P. Kessler:
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> > The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
> > above it.
> >
>
> That makes sense, of course.
>
> Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
> the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Perhaps it
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header "by your-MTA" is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
>>> attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp
>>> session? Background is the current
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:48:31PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> >On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> >
> >
> >>would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
> >>attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> would it be possible/valuable to enhance xforward by additional
> attributes reflecting the tls parameters of the upstream smtp session?
> Background is the current development of a content/proxyfilter.
What problem would this so
