mouss escribió:
kyoku cocinillas wrote:
Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can
figure out where to route all the incoming email without having to
use the recipient_bcc_maps, but i cant find a workaround for the
sender_bcc_maps, i can only configure one email accoun
mouss escribió:
kyoku cocinillas wrote:
Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can
figure out where to route all the incoming email without having to
use the recipient_bcc_maps, but i cant find a workaround for the
sender_bcc_maps, i can only configure one email accoun
kyoku cocinillas wrote:
Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can figure
out where to route all the incoming email without having to use the
recipient_bcc_maps, but i cant find a workaround for the
sender_bcc_maps, i can only configure one email account, and i would
lik
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:24:31PM +0200, kyoku cocinillas wrote:
> >The BCC address is subject to virtual alias expansion (and aliases(5)
> >expansion for any resulting local recipients).
>
> Hi, i am also interested in this feature, with the aliases i can figure
> out where to route all the inc
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 08:04:25PM -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalh?es wrote:
Hello Guys,
From http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html i have:
sender_bcc_maps (default: empty)
Optional BCC (blind carbon-copy) address lookup tables, indexed by
sender a
