LuKreme a écrit :
> On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * LuKreme :
>>> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^pos
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaste
On 27-Mar-2009, at 09:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LuKreme :
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email
* LuKreme :
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>>>
>>> [some checks up here that reject]
>>> /^postmaster\@/ OK
>>> /^abuse\@/ OK
>>
>> Why do these email address patterns appear i
On 26-Mar-2009, at 18:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
[some checks up here that reject]
/^postmaster\@/ OK
/^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
Because 9 yea
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
Why do these email address patterns appear in a HELO access(5) map?
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important tha
LuKreme a écrit :
> I have in my postffix helo checks, perhaps a bad idea,
>
> [some checks up here that reject]
> /^postmaster\@/ OK
> /^abuse\@/ OK
>
> At the time I set this up it was pretty important that postmaster mail
> got through, but looking over the last 12 months of mail, I've re
On 26-Mar-2009, at 14:10, LuKreme wrote:
Once the message gets OKed by helo_checks.pcre it does not get
checked by the reject_rbl_client.
Ah.. OK, this is not right. It is just that the IP was not in the RBL
when that message came through.
So, the original question still stands:
is there
On 26-Mar-2009, at 13:36, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is
there
something that I can do to stop the connections for
LuKreme wrote:
> On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
>>> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>>>
>>> Return-Path:
>>> X-Ori
On 26-Mar-2009, at 11:53, Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like
this:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
Del
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
> something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Delivered-To: postmas...@covisp.net
> Recei
12 matches
Mail list logo
