Zhang Huangbin kirjoitti:
On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver.
Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any
good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
As i know, postfix
Zhang Huangbin:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> > I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and
> > mailserver.
> >
> > Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any
> > good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
>
>
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver.
>>
>> Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any
>> good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
>
> As i k
On Oct 10, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and
mailserver.
Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any
good and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
As i know, postfix-2.3.x which shipped in
Eero Volotinen:
> I am currently using postfix 2.3.x on RHEL for mail proxy and mailserver.
>
> Is there any good reason to update to 2.6 ? and if is, is there any good
> and stable rpm repositories for RHEL 5 on web ?
You can use Postfix 2.3 until one of the following happens:
1) You need some
