Stan Hoeppner:
> So the postscreen connection limit is good for slowing bots, no surprise
> since bots are the postscreen target, but the smtpd connection limit is
> still appropriate/needed for slowing legit bulk mailer clients, assuming
> one chooses to use it vs the other anvil based restriction
On 4/3/2012 10:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Setting smtpd_client_connection_count_limit also sets
>> postscreen_client_connection_count_limit if you're using postfix 2.8 and
>> postscreen. Thus the limit is enforced before connections are handed to
>> smtpd processes, so you don
Stan Hoeppner:
> Setting smtpd_client_connection_count_limit also sets
> postscreen_client_connection_count_limit if you're using postfix 2.8 and
> postscreen. Thus the limit is enforced before connections are handed to
> smtpd processes, so you don't needlessly eat up additional smtpds.
Note tha
On 4/2/2012 1:51 AM, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
> Thank you very much for your explanations.
>
> I'm going to test with smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 1
>
> Three days ago I added smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 10, wich limit
> the number of connection by a client to 10 by time unit;
Jeremie CEINTREY"
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Envoyé: Samedi 31 Mars 2012 19:16:57
Objet: Re: performance problems
On 3/30/2012 2:40 AM, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
Due to lack of any evidence I'll have to make some coarse educated
guesses here.
> I often encounter performance problems w
On 3/30/2012 2:40 AM, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
Due to lack of any evidence I'll have to make some coarse educated
guesses here.
> I often encounter performance problems with postfix and mailing-list.
Mailing list servers. Implicates rapid and likely parallel delivery
over a short interval.
> I
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Tomas Macek :
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
mails are in active queue.
Amavis Processes :
$max_servers =3D 8; # 2 processes by core
Actually, the server is ok, not stressed at all, the relay mail is slow.
What from amavis do y
* Tomas Macek :
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
>
> >mails are in active queue.
> >
> >Amavis Processes :
> >$max_servers =3D 8; # 2 processes by core
> >
> >Actually, the server is ok, not stressed at all, the relay mail is slow.
> >
>
> What from amavis do you have in your master
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
mails are in active queue.
Amavis Processes :
$max_servers =3D 8; # 2 processes by core
Actually, the server is ok, not stressed at all, the relay mail is slow.
What from amavis do you have in your master.cf file?
The master.cf option "-o max_us
On 30/03/2012 11:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jeremie CEINTREY :
>> mails are in active queue.
>>
>> Amavis Processes :
>> $max_servers = 8; # 2 processes by core
>>
>> Actually, the server is ok, not stressed at all, the relay mail is slow.
>
> What about amavisd-nanny?
>
What about network b
* Jeremie CEINTREY :
> mails are in active queue.
>
> Amavis Processes :
> $max_servers = 8; # 2 processes by core
>
> Actually, the server is ok, not stressed at all, the relay mail is slow.
What about amavisd-nanny?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - U
Am 30.03.2012 10:33, schrieb Jeremie CEINTREY:
> About Logs, what log do you want ? /var/log/mail.log is huge
grep i.e about big mail sites that i.e use greylisting ( 450 etc )
and lead to big queues
after all you should ever have some idea whats goings on in your logs
even when they are big
--
org
Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Mars 2012 11:04:01
Objet: Re: performance problems
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
So, are the quede mails BEFORE smtp-amavis or behind it?
How many amavis processes are running? Are they all busy (use
amavisd-nanny to find out!)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschä
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
So, are the quede mails BEFORE smtp-amavis or behind it?
How many amavis processes are running? Are they all busy (use
amavisd-nanny to find out!)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berl
>> First, thank you for your help.
>>
>> I often encounter performance problems with postfix and mailing-list.
>> I have a relay mail postfix filtering mail traffic for about 12 000
>> mailboxes. Mailboxes are hosted on other mail servers.
>>
>> I use also amavisd-new with spammassassin and clamav.
ginal -
De: "Robert Schetterer"
À: postfix-users@postfix.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Mars 2012 09:58:26
Objet: Re: performance problems
Am 30.03.2012 09:40, schrieb Jeremie CEINTREY:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> First, thank you for your help.
>
> I often encounter performance
Am 30.03.2012 09:40, schrieb Jeremie CEINTREY:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> First, thank you for your help.
>
> I often encounter performance problems with postfix and mailing-list.
> I have a relay mail postfix filtering mail traffic for about 12 000
> mailboxes. Mailboxes are hosted on other mail ser
On 03/30/2012 10:40 AM, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
> My problem is that I often see that mailq grows up to 7000 mails and it
> takes about 2 hours to deliver those mails. I don't understand why it is
> so slow.
We don't have a magic ball. Logs (and sometime configs) are very helpful.
--
Sincerely,
18 matches
Mail list logo
