Re: MX backup doesn't queue

2017-09-05 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-01 22:57 Noel Jones ha scritto: [..] On the backup MX: [..] Well, finally we did it! Basically I think we can say that the backup server does not have to recognize as local, domains and addresses. This is what I did: "server1.org" the.backed-up.domain.tld (primary domain) "serve

Re: MX backup doesn't queue

2017-09-03 Thread Noel Jones
On 9/3/2017 6:28 AM, Davide Marchi wrote: > Il 2017-09-01 22:57 Noel Jones ha scritto: > [..] >> >> On the backup MX: >> >> >> DO NOT list the domain in mydestination, virtual_alias_domains, or >> mailbox_domains parameters.  These list domains for local delivery. > > > You mean: do not list the

Re: MX backup doesn't queue

2017-09-03 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-09-01 22:57 Noel Jones ha scritto: [..] On the backup MX: DO NOT list the domain in mydestination, virtual_alias_domains, or mailbox_domains parameters. These list domains for local delivery. You mean: do not list the domain of the *primary server* in mydestination, virtual_alias_

Re: MX backup doesn't queue

2017-09-01 Thread Noel Jones
> My point is to understand why Postfix (on MX backup) store email > into mailbox and does not queue them. On the backup MX: DO NOT list the domain in mydestination, virtual_alias_domains, or mailbox_domains parameters. These list domains for local delivery. DO list the domain in relay_domain

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/13/2014 3:08 PM, Pol Hallen wrote: > >> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records, >> intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the >> backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary. >> >> But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 13.03.2014 21:08, schrieb Pol Hallen: >> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records, >> intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the >> backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary. >> >> But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread Pol Hallen
> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records, > intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the > backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary. > > But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most folks have dropped > them because they're spam

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/13/2014 8:42 AM, Pol Hallen wrote: > Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server > > main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.), > when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup > server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue. >

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 13.03.2014 14:46, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: > Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen: >> Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server >> >> main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.), >> when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup >> s

Re: mx backup

2014-03-13 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen: > Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server > > main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.), > when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup > server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue.

Re: MX Backup

2010-12-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Bissio2000: > Hi all, > > i'm setting postfix server as primary and mx backup as well and i'm not > using relay_domains directive. > this is my configuration: > > DNS > domain.com IN MX 10 primary.server.com > domain.com IN MX 20 secondary.server.com > > POSTFIX > transport_maps = mysql:/etc/pos