Wael MANAI:
> Yes I know that. Look this is the mailer-daemon sent by postfix (bold
> line at the end of the message). In the notification only "552
> Requested ..." must appear, why 250-PIPELINING too?
By the multiline rule of RFC 5321:
1) The EHLO reply is:
250 whatever
2) The MAIL FROM r
Yes I know that. Look this is the mailer-daemon sent by postfix (bold
line at the end of the message). In the notification only "552
Requested ..." must appear, why 250-PIPELINING too?
"Received: by relay.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 9E06D8E87A; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
Am 20.06.2012 16:10, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Wael MANAI:
>> What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
>> 250-PIPELINING...
>
> You are mistaken.
>
> The "security" software sends
>
> 250 whatever
> 250-PIPELINING
> 552 whatever
>
> The 250-PIPELINING is NOT P
Wael MANAI:
> What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
> 250-PIPELINING...
You are mistaken.
The "security" software sends
250 whatever
250-PIPELINING
552 whatever
The 250-PIPELINING is NOT PART OF THE EHLO RESPONSE.
In RFC 5321, section "4.2.1. Reply Code Sev
What do you mean "security software"? It's postfix which adds
250-PIPELINING...
Here is postfconf -n output:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alternate_config_directories = /etc/postfix_out
always_add_missing_headers = no
append_at_myorigin = no
append_dot_mydomain = no
best_mx_transport = d
Wael MANAI:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my problem. I try to send one message which is refused by remote
> mailer (at MAIL FROM Level) with error:
>
> 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation
>
> wireshark tcp stream:
>
> 220 81.52.180.21 ESMTP
> EHLO relay.com
> 250 81.52.180.21[
Am 20.06.2012 15:28, schrieb Wael MANAI:
> where 250-PIPELINING concerns EHLO command.
> Why for an error on MAIL FROM, postfix adds EHLO reply?
nobody knows because you do not submit logs nor output
of postconf -n so nobody is able to guess what is
happening on a foreign machine
signature.as
