Re: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/11/2011 1:22 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:58:10AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: On 2/11/2011 11:36 AM, Gary Smith wrote: Um, if you put the restriction twice doesn't it give it a greater effect? ;) To increase the effect, google for the reject_unknown_sender_domain_dammit f

Re: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:58:10AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > On 2/11/2011 11:36 AM, Gary Smith wrote: > >Um, if you put the restriction twice doesn't it give it a > >greater effect? ;) > > To increase the effect, google for the > reject_unknown_sender_domain_dammit feature patch. This opens up a

Re: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/11/2011 11:36 AM, Gary Smith wrote: You must have permit_sasl_authenticated in smtpd_recipient_restrictions to allow users to relay. Typically on the outgoing only server, only smtpd_recipient_restrictions is used and the other smtpd_*_restrictions sections are empty. Gotcha The one

RE: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Gary Smith
> You must have permit_sasl_authenticated in > smtpd_recipient_restrictions to allow users to relay. > Typically on the outgoing only server, only > smtpd_recipient_restrictions is used and the other > smtpd_*_restrictions sections are empty. > Gotcha > > The one that's repeated ;) > reject_

Re: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/11/2011 10:55 AM, Gary Smith wrote: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject This line is sufficient to limit access to mynetworks and authenticated users. Do I even need this at all if I'm using smtpd_sender_restrictions since this is an outgo

RE: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Gary Smith
> HOLD always take place last, and only accepted mail is put on > HOLD. Since this server is for user submission and all mail > is either authenticated or rejected, it doesn't matter too > much where you put the hold. Good to know. I probably asked the same question years ago, but this helps. >

Re: hold after permit question

2011-02-11 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/10/2011 11:58 PM, Gary Smith wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Gary Smith Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:34 PM To: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' Subject: hold after permit question I have clien

RE: hold after permit question

2011-02-10 Thread Gary Smith
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] > On Behalf Of Gary Smith > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:34 PM > To: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' > Subject: hold after permit question > > I have clients relaying email through a