Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Vladislav Antolik :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
> > Is there any possibility to do it?
>
> Only with MX lookups
And with (smtp_)fallback_relay.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
/etc/p
* Vladislav Antolik :
> Hello,
>
> I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
> Is there any possibility to do it?
Only with MX lookups
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgda
Hello,
I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
Is there any possibility to do it?
Vladislav
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Steve Heaven :
>>
>> We have a client who has an Exchange server on the end of two xDSL
>> lines. We currently deliver vi
* Steve Heaven :
>
> We have a client who has an Exchange server on the end of two xDSL
> lines. We currently deliver via SMTP to the IP address of one of the
> lines. We would like to have postfix try the other line if the xDSL on
> the first one is down.
>
> Looking at the docs fallback_rely wo
Quoting Victor Duchovni :
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:46:06PM +0700, ke...@auditsi.com wrote:
my question is, if some process (not because upgrading) in my
content-filter error, the mail then will be relayed to the 2nd instance
with no filter at all?
Is there option to control it for temporary
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:46:06PM +0700, ke...@auditsi.com wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I set 2 postfix instances, one with amavisd-new, the other with no
> conten-filter at all.
> I'm using fallback_relay to the 2nd instance.
>
> I upgrade my clamav today so there is an error in my conten-filter for a
