Re: expensive checks first

2011-06-09 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:59:53PM -0400, John wrote: > Is there something that shows the "expense" associated with each check. > I have looked through the documentation on the postfix site but could not > find anything. Just common sense. Expense is mostly a question of latency and not over-usi

Re: expensive checks first

2011-06-09 Thread John
Is there something that shows the "expense" associated with each check. I have looked through the documentation on the postfix site but could not find anything. John A -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

Re: expensive checks first

2011-06-08 Thread mouss
Le 08/06/2011 15:21, jimbob palmer a écrit : > Hello, > > Say I wanted to whitelist a specific email recipient always and > forever, but apply normal spam checks to everything else, could I do > that? yes. my "standard" setup includes a check_recipient_access just after reject_unauth_dest

Re: expensive checks first

2011-06-08 Thread jimbob palmer
2011/6/8 Wietse Venema : > jimbob palmer: >> Hello, >> >> Say I wanted to whitelist a specific email recipient always and >> forever, but apply normal spam checks to everything else, could I do >> that? >> >> i.e. can I do the expensive checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions first? > > /etc/postfix

Re: expensive checks first

2011-06-08 Thread Wietse Venema
jimbob palmer: > Hello, > > Say I wanted to whitelist a specific email recipient always and > forever, but apply normal spam checks to everything else, could I do > that? > > i.e. can I do the expensive checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions first? /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restri