I ran into a problem that seems to have some of the same attributes. In
my case Google was rejecting my email, however they may have been a
little more polite about doing so.
Have you checked your DNS and reverse DNS entries. Is your server a
dedicated system with a single IP address.
In my
Mathieu R.:
> As it seem to be a good advice, I did change my dns entries for
> mx to mail.effraie.org, wich is covered by the (new) cacert
> certificat of the mail server.
>
> I still have the same error in logs
It does not matter what the server certificate says, because it is
never sent. The
James Cloos a écrit :
>The mx lookup on effraie.org returns mx.effraie.org. The cert
>mx.effraie.org sends has a number of dnsnames, but not mx.effraie.org.
>
>I bet that is why the session failed.
>
>The mx for 400iso.net, mx.400iso.net, sends the same cert and also
>likely will fail tls negoti
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 03:31:38PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> The mx lookup on effraie.org returns mx.effraie.org. The cert
> mx.effraie.org sends has a number of dnsnames, but not mx.effraie.org.
>
> I bet that is why the session failed.
I noticed this, but I thought it unlikely that a sender
The mx lookup on effraie.org returns mx.effraie.org. The cert
mx.effraie.org sends has a number of dnsnames, but not mx.effraie.org.
I bet that is why the session failed.
The mx for 400iso.net, mx.400iso.net, sends the same cert and also
likely will fail tls negotiation with some senders.
In ge
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 08:45:05AM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
> >Yahoo sends "STARTTLS", Postfix says "go ahead" and Yahoo
> >disconnects.
> >There's is nothing more to it. Some strange problem on the Yahoo
> >side, unless your firewall is blocking the handshake.
>
> My firewall is not doing such
> So, there is nothing i can do ?
If you don't need TLS for yahoo you can disable it for that server. Take
a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps
Le 14/09/2013 03:23, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:51:39PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
not very much more :
Sep 13 23:33:09 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[25221]: connect from
ng4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com[98.139.164.99]
Sep 13 23:33:44 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[25221]: SSL_accept e
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:51:39PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
> not very much more :
>
> Sep 13 23:33:09 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[25221]: connect from
> ng4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com[98.139.164.99]
> Sep 13 23:33:44 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[25221]: SSL_accept error
> from ng4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.co
On Sep 13, 2013, at 23:51, Mathieu R. wrote:
> Le 13/09/2013 23:26, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
>> If your traffic volume is not too heavy, you can temporarily raise
>> the Postfix SMTP server TLS log level to "2":
>>
>> smtpd_tls_loglevel = 2
>>
>> this will show more details of the TLS han
Le 13/09/2013 23:26, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
>There is generally more information in the log than this when the
>TLS handshake fails. DO NOT over-summarize the logs.
Sep 13 22:58:40 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[22230]: SSL_accept error
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
> >There is generally more information in the log than this when the
> >TLS handshake fails. DO NOT over-summarize the logs.
>
> Sep 13 22:58:40 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[22230]: SSL_accept error
> from ng4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com[98.13
Le 13/09/2013 22:29, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:44:38PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
Sep 13 21:31:34 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[12650]: SSL_accept error
from ng17.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
There is generally more information in the log than this when the
TLS handshake fails
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:44:38PM +0200, Mathieu R. wrote:
> Sep 13 21:31:34 effraie01 postfix/smtpd[12650]: SSL_accept error
> from ng17.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
There is generally more information in the log than this when the
TLS handshake fails. DO NOT over-summarize the logs.
> (ever fro
14 matches
Mail list logo