Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-09 Thread Michael B Allen
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi Mike, > > ~all denotes "soft fail". In other words that means that if you forget > to add an IP address of your new server to SPF it is not going to be a > total failure :) Soft fail allows to undertake other steps in case it > happens (say i.e. yo

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-09 Thread DTNX Postmaster
On 09 Jun 2015, at 07:39, Michael B Allen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, DTNX Postmaster wrote: >> On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen wrote: >> >>> I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing >>> everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and >>>

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-09 Thread Peter
Hi Mike, ~all denotes "soft fail". In other words that means that if you forget to add an IP address of your new server to SPF it is not going to be a total failure :) Soft fail allows to undertake other steps in case it happens (say i.e. you could perform other checks to determine if the email c

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-08 Thread Michael B Allen
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, DTNX Postmaster wrote: > On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing >> everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and >> mail.busicorp.com. >> >> My understanding is the following

Re: Very Basic SPF Record

2015-06-08 Thread DTNX Postmaster
On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen wrote: > I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing > everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and > mail.busicorp.com. > > My understanding is the following is probably what I want: > > v=spf1 mx ~all > > Would you ag