Brett @Google:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Brett @Google:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> > > library formats when com
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Brett @Google:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> > library formats when compared to Linux.
> >
> > (runnin
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
>
> > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> > library formats whe
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
> I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> library formats when compared to Linux.
As Wietse said, nothing relevant changed in
--On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:27 PM +1000 "Brett @Google"
wrote:
Hello,
I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
library formats when compared to Linux.
(running on SunOS server 5.10
Brett @Google:
> Hello,
>
> I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> library formats when compared to Linux.
>
> (running on SunOS server 5.10 Generic_150400-29 sun4v sparc sun4v)
The chanc
* amira :
> I was using postfix 2.3 on centos 5.7 and using sasl authentication. When I
> tried to upgrade to postfix 2.7 I got error when sending mail using outlook
> client smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL support is not compiled in
> while it sends normally using telnet.
>
> I am using
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Subject: Re: Upgrading Postfix and invalid/obseleted config values.
> > If you would like to have a quota on your maildir mailboxes, the
> best
> > solution is to alw
On 19/03/11 09:49, Simon Brereton wrote:
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Bromberg
Just being a googlebot again, but does this help?
http://www.courier-mta.org/imap/README.maildirquota.html
Using the Maildir++ extended Maildir
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: Upgrading Postfix and invalid/obseleted config values.
>
> If you don't mind a short delay between "reaching quota" and
> "stoppin
If you don't mind a short delay between "reaching quota" and
"stopping mail", then you could run a cron job that maintains an
smtpd access map for users that reach the limit. This way, you
don't have to send non-delivery status notifications and you also
don't have to discard any email.
Basic proc
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Bromberg
> Subject: Re: Upgrading Postfix and invalid/obseleted config values.
>
> On 3/18/2011 2:45 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>>> Thi
On 3/18/2011 2:45 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
[snip]
This is not part of Postfix. It is a third-party quota patch that
some distributors include. For support, ask the distributor.
Thank you for knowing my system better than I do (did I mention
it's a
few years) since I did the initial install.
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:15 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Upgrading Postfix and invalid/obseleted config values.
>
> Simon Brereton:
> > > &g
>
> Dovecot has quotas built-in and other features such as per-user
> filters that Postfix will not provide. It also plays nice with
> Postfix to authenticate SMTP clients with SASL. Dovecot, hooked up
> to Postfix with LMTP would be a good combination.
>
>Wietse
>
Well, users usually inte
Simon Brereton:
> > > 768 virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/Mail-Quota.cf
> > > 769 virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no
> > > 770 virtual_maildir_extended = yes
> > > 771 virtual_create_maildirsize = yes
> > > 772 virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes
> > > 773 virtual_overquota_bounce =
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> Subject: Re: Upgrading Postfix and invalid/obseleted config values.
>
> Simon Brereton:
> > 768 virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/Mail-Quota.cf
> > 769 virtual_mailb
Simon Brereton:
> 768 virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/Mail-Quota.cf
> 769 virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no
> 770 virtual_maildir_extended = yes
> 771 virtual_create_maildirsize = yes
> 772 virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes
> 773 virtual_overquota_bounce = yes
This is not part of
On Feb 15, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Eero Volotinen :
I have Postfix 2.1.5 running on Mac Server 10.4.11. I would like
to upgrade Postfix. Which version would you recommend?
Thanks in advance for advise.
How about latest stable version (2.7) ?
Since Apple made a signi
* Eero Volotinen :
> > I have Postfix 2.1.5 running on Mac Server 10.4.11. I would like to upgrade
> > Postfix. Which version would you recommend?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for advise.
>
> How about latest stable version (2.7) ?
Since Apple made a significant number of changes: Stick with the Ap
2010/2/15 Jeff Bernier :
> Hello,
>
> I have Postfix 2.1.5 running on Mac Server 10.4.11. I would like to upgrade
> Postfix. Which version would you recommend?
>
> Thanks in advance for advise.
How about latest stable version (2.7) ?
--
Eero
21 matches
Mail list logo
