Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>>>
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>>
>>
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
Right and that means the type is C
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
>> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
> Right and that means the type is Cyrus?
>
> Robert
You seem to have had Cyrus working, but want to break it to try to us
On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote
vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote
vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0
On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote
vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0
Robert A. Ober wrote:
> On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Robert A. Ober wrote
>>
> vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd :
>
>
FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot
>
> There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0 that requires
> SASL_AUTHMECH=shadow in /etc/sasl2/saslauthd.
>
> N
On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote:
Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated
error. It doe