Nikolaos Milas:
> On 4/11/2012 8:17 ??, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
> > of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
>
> A clarification: Does the cache of "reject_unverified_recipient"
> decisions include the result of "rel
>> Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
>> of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
>
> A clarification: Does the cache of "reject_unverified_recipient" decisions
> include the result of "relay_recipient_maps" lookups?
>
> This might be esp. useful in case
On 4/11/2012 8:17 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
A clarification: Does the cache of "reject_unverified_recipient"
decisions include the result of "relay_recipient_maps" lookups?
T
Am 06.11.2012 um 08:31 schrieb Christian Rößner :
> I also will test, if "sieve reject" is working the same way. If so, I can
> enable this flag and give users a chance to reject unwanted mails in session.
"reject" creates a new mail and sends it out.
-Christian Rößner
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://
Hi,
>> Quick question: With Dovecot (or other LMTP servers) does this
>> detect over-quota conditions? The Postfix verification probe does
>> not send any message data, just "MAIL FROM", "RCPT TO" and then
>> "RSET" + "QUIT" (or perhaps just "QUIT").
>
> Postfix sends the message size in the MAIL
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:11:56PM +0100, Christian R??ner wrote:
>
> > > Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
> > > of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
> >
> >
> > thank you very much. Tested it and the solution is so simple and
>
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:11:56PM +0100, Christian R??ner wrote:
> > Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
> > of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
>
>
> thank you very much. Tested it and the solution is so simple and
> at the same time so powerful. I
Hi,
> Or use "reject_unverified_recipient", which uses a cache
> of previous decisions so it won't hammer the mailbox server.
thank you very much. Tested it and the solution is so simple and at the same
time so powerful. I wonder that there are still many people not thinking about
this solutio
Hi,
> You can use a policy daemon to check quota on cyrus.
>
> []'s
I have written a python policy service that can check for "over quota". It is a
basic version that runs with Dovecot here. It has the following limitations:
- Dovecot must have been configured with a master user
- It requires
Am 04.11.2012 19:05, schrieb Christian Rößner:
> Hi,
>
>>> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option (or
>>> however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and open a
>>> connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in memory and wait for
>>> the res
Wietse Venema:
> Christian R??ner:
> > Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option
> > (or however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and
> > open a connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in
> > memory and wait for the result of the LMTP server? If
Hi Wietse,
>> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option
>> (or however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and
>> open a connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in
>> memory and wait for the result of the LMTP server? If the LMTP
>
> This does no
Hi,
>> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option (or
>> however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and open a
>> connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in memory and wait for
>> the result of the LMTP server? If the LMTP process gets 250 OK,
Christian R??ner:
> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option
> (or however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and
> open a connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in
> memory and wait for the result of the LMTP server? If the LMTP
This does not
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 06:16:26PM +0100, Christian R??ner wrote:
> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option
> (or however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and
> open a connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in
> memory and wait for the resul
Am 04.11.2012 18:16, schrieb Christian Rößner:
> Would it technically possible to have a smtpd_to_lmtp_proxy option (or
> however it could be called), that would receive on smtpd and open a
> connection to its LMTP server, doing cleanup and Co. in memory and wait for
> the result of the LMTP s
You can use a policy daemon to check quota on cyrus.
[]'s
Reinaldo de Carvalho
Em 04/11/2012, às 14:16, Christian Rößner escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I have thought a while, if I can ask that here, but as it just is a technical
> question, I hope you understand that I am just interested to understand
17 matches
Mail list logo
