> > On the older box, every day I see a message stating that
> > hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients has changed -- restarting.
>
> This happens when an smtpd(8) notices a table change after processing
> a request and just before accepting another. A sufficiently idle
> system will not have any m
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
>
> > Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
> > new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
>
> This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
>
> > On the older box, every day I see a messa
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Who Me wrote:
> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
> new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily
This table is consulted *only* by smtpd(8).
> On the older box, every day I see a message stating that
> hash:/etc/postf
On 12/19/2011 12:21 PM, Who Me wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I like the way you think - but unfortunately,
> none of the services are chrooted. I am able to see other (normal) postfix
> messages in syslog. Additionally, both boxes are configured to log all mail
> messages the same:
On 12/19/2011 12:21 PM, Who Me wrote:
>
>
>>> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
>>> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
>>> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
>>> very similar me
>> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
>> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
>> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a
>> very similar method as described here:
>> http://postfix.stat
Zitat von Noel Jones :
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail
relay. Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my
new one (V2.8.7) update their relay_recipients table daily from
Active Directory, using a very s
On 12/19/2011 9:54 AM, Who Me wrote:
>
>
> I'm in the process of replacing the hardware for my external mail relay.
> Both my existing postfix (V2.5.5) implementation, and my new one (V2.8.7)
> update their relay_recipients table daily from Active Directory, using a very
> similar method as d