Jonathan K. Tullett:
> On 21 December 2014 at 13:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Since the end of October, that number has dropped to 16 a second
> > > on a good day.
> >
> > What has changed? Obiously, Postfix didn't change, and replacing
> > Postfix isn't going to make a difference.
> >
>
>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +, Jonathan K. Tullett wrote:
> Have there been huge improvements to the efficiency of the code base
> between 2.6 and 2.9 (or 2.11)? Does anyone have suggestions on where else
> I can look for the cause?
>
> Thank you in advance for any help you can provid
On 12/21/2014 3:13 AM, Jonathan K. Tullett wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been using Postfix for many years - since about 2002 - and I've
> finally come across a problem I've not been able to resolve by
> searching online, or from tapping into my personal network. So I
> have come to you all for hel
Christian R??ner:
> Prior to the last week of October using the distribution manager,
> it was possible on machine A to inject around 25 messages (full
> size - about 70k each) a second into the maildrop queue.
>
> Since the end of October, that number has dropped to 16 a second
> on a good day.
W
> Am 21.12.2014 um 10:13 schrieb Jonathan K. Tullett
> :
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've been using Postfix for many years - since about 2002 - and I've finally
> come across a problem I've not been able to resolve by searching online, or
> from tapping into my personal network. So I have come to you
