Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-12-02 Thread Mark Martinec
OT, sorry, just to finish up this thread: myself: > I'm working on a SpamAssassin plugin to implement Spamhaus DWL > (and other 'SA tag'- based DNS lookups). Done. Available in the SpamAssassin SVN trunk (on its way to become 3.4.0): https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6518

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Christian Roessner: > >> I am interested in including the DWL feature from SpamHaus into > >> postfix. > > Wietse: > >> DWL requires content external content inspection. For example, a > >> Milter, or a before-or-after-queue SMTP-based filter. Either approach > >> can be used to verify the DKIM si

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-15 Thread Christian Roessner
>> I am interested in including the DWL feature from SpamHaus into >> postfix. > Wietse: >> DWL requires content external content inspection. For example, a >> Milter, or a before-or-after-queue SMTP-based filter. Either approach >> can be used to verify the DKIM signature and the VBR header. > >

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-15 Thread Mark Martinec
Christian Roessner: > I am interested in including the DWL feature from SpamHaus into > postfix. Wietse: > DWL requires content external content inspection. For example, a > Milter, or a before-or-after-queue SMTP-based filter. Either approach > can be used to verify the DKIM signature and the VBR

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:38:22 +0100, Christian Roessner wrote: > I think that I alone can not do this. But I have seen, there are > several other VBR using websites, so this really could be interesting. > Yet I do not know, how to deal with the DKIM verification, as of > writing this, I use amavi

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-15 Thread Christian Roessner
>> Because my guess is that I have to use some kind of a pre-queue-milter >> to check for the VBR-Header and if it exists doing some DWL-DNS >> lookup. > > Please be careful. The mere existence of a VBR-Info header is > insufficient; before performing any DWL lookups, be sure to use a > suitable v

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-14 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 13:24:59 +0100, Christian Roessner wrote: > Because my guess is that I have to use some kind of a pre-queue-milter > to check for the VBR-Header and if it exists doing some DWL-DNS > lookup. Please be careful. The mere existence of a VBR-Info header is insufficient; before p

Re: Spamhaus DWL in postfix

2010-11-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Christian Roessner: > I am interested in including the DWL feature from SpamHaus into > postfix. DWL requires content external content inspection. For example, a Milter, or a before-or-after-queue SMTP-based filter. Either approach can be used to verify the DKIM signature and the VBR header.