Awesome, thanks for everyone's advice.
On 12/25/14 7:19 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
oh and don't forget URIBL scores for SpamAssassin
URIBL_BLACK has a zero-false-positive policy
as said, sapmass-milter runs with block above 8.0 here and the default
max-message size which is scanned is *way*
oh and don't forget URIBL scores for SpamAssassin
URIBL_BLACK has a zero-false-positive policy
as said, sapmass-milter runs with block above 8.0 here and the default
max-message size which is scanned is *way* too low, spammers know that
/usr/sbin/spamass-milter -p /run/spamass-milter/spamass-m
make them hate you by more aggresive RBL scoring and *slow down them* as
well as consider a manual trained global bayes with at least 1000 ham
and 1000 spam messages
* find common tags in the maillog
* adjust scores in SA local.cf for them
* adjust the scores for bayes after it si well trained
Asai:
> Greetings,
>
> We have a real spam problem for some users, and this seems to be really
> tough spam to block. I have postscreen set up which blocks a lot of
> spam, of the spam that does get through, Spamassassin catches about 200
> spams a day, but we have about a dozen users that get
