On 10/6/2009 8:06 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Is the order significant, i.e. is permit_mynetworks,
The order of restrictions is generally significant.
permit_sasl_authenticated the same as
permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks?
No. The first example does not al
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Is the order significant, i.e. is permit_mynetworks,
The order of restrictions is generally significant.
permit_sasl_authenticated the same as
permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks?
No. The first example does not allow networks
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
> ># main.cf
> >mynetworks = 127.0.0.1
> >
> >and everywhere that you have "permit_sasl_authenticated", make
> >sure it now says "permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated".
> Is the order significant, i.e. is permit_mynetworks,
Th
Noel Jones wrote:
# main.cf
mynetworks = 127.0.0.1
and everywhere that you have "permit_sasl_authenticated", make sure it
now says "permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated".
Is the order significant, i.e. is permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated the same as
permit_sasl_authenticat
On 10/6/2009 7:16 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
I'd like email from localhost to not require certificates or
authentication--especially since we assume that people on the machine,
or tunneling to the machine have already passed some level of
authentication. How do I do it?
Patrick
# main.cf
mynet
