Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-19 Thread Jelle de Jong
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:03:39PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: >> I got some more debug information from the other server that initiates >> the sending of the mail. > > "terminated by signal 11". Signal 11 is SIGSEGV, aka segmentation fault, > on most systems out there. Ther

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:03:39PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > I got some more debug information from the other server that initiates > the sending of the mail. "terminated by signal 11". Signal 11 is SIGSEGV, aka segmentation fault, on most systems out there. There system is severely broken. B

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-19 Thread Jelle de Jong
Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:43:34PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > >> Bastian Blank wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: Would you be willing to have an other look at the logs? I still have the issue and I had to turn smtpd_tls_

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-18 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:43:34PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > >> Would you be willing to have an other look at the logs? I still have the > >> issue and I had to turn smtpd_tls_security_level to none, so t

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-17 Thread Jelle de Jong
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: >> Would you be willing to have an other look at the logs? I still have the >> issue and I had to turn smtpd_tls_security_level to none, so the work >> processes of my customer could go on, but I don't think this

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > Would you be willing to have an other look at the logs? I still have the > issue and I had to turn smtpd_tls_security_level to none, so the work > processes of my customer could go on, but I don't think this workaround > will be the s

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-17 Thread Jelle de Jong
Jelle de Jong wrote: > Wietse Venema wrote: >> Wietse Venema: >>> Jelle de Jong: Jun 15 13:57:46 emily postfix/smtpd[23401]: input attribute name: seed Jun 15 13:57:46 emily postfix/smtpd[23401]: input attribute value: YuvlIV0a1sMFU6JK6BcvsKr6WJm8YP7zsFNJz/XEv+w= Jun 15 13:57:4

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-16 Thread Jelle de Jong
Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > >> Thank you Wietse, I have asked the other server party to see if they can >> sent me the logs, I hope they will sent them, they say the problem is on >> my end, but I have no diffidence for that so far. >>

Re: SSL_accept error - somebody that could tell me what to do

2009-06-16 Thread Jelle de Jong
Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: >> Jelle de Jong: >>> Jun 15 13:57:46 emily postfix/smtpd[23401]: input attribute name: seed >>> Jun 15 13:57:46 emily postfix/smtpd[23401]: input attribute value: >>> YuvlIV0a1sMFU6JK6BcvsKr6WJm8YP7zsFNJz/XEv+w= >>> Jun 15 13:57:46 emily postfix/smtpd[23401]: