> On 6 Nov 2021, at 5:33 pm, Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>> I think that the default setting:
>>nested_header_checks = $header_checks
>> is unfortunate, perhaps we should change it to empty at compatibility
>> level >= 3.7.
>
> On current test setup, I do not define nested_headers_check at all.
Il 2021-11-06 19:04 Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto:
Though I don't recommend complex all-in-one configurations, you
use the "-o cleanup_service_name" option to configure separate
cleanup(8) services for separate smtpd(8) instances:
Yes, in my initial testing, I was missing -o cleanup_service_name
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 06:51:03PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> But I was also interested in a single server solution, not least to
> better understand postfix itself.
Though I don't recommend complex all-in-one configurations, you
use the "-o cleanup_service_name" option to configure separate
Il 2021-11-06 16:47 Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:51:06PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
I was tasked to mark all messages coming from unauthenticated clients
(ie: incoming emails) with a specific subject line.
Best practice when requirements get complicated is to divid
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:51:06PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> I was tasked to mark all messages coming from unauthenticated clients
> (ie: incoming emails) with a specific subject line.
Best practice when requirements get complicated is to divide and
conquer. Use a separate dedicated machin
Il 2021-11-05 11:37 Dominic Raferd ha scritto:
I think you need to ensure that the rule runs only for Subject:
headers, escape square brackets in the if clause, and cover the
possibility of no space after 'Subject:' (note: all untested):
if /^Subject:/i
if !/^Subject: \[EXTERNAL\]/i
/^Subject: ?
On 05/11/2021 10:20, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 2021-11-05 09:36 Dominic Raferd ha scritto:
Why permit auth connections on port 25? Restrict them to 587 and/or
465 then you can specify subject rewriting for (all) mails arriving
via port 25. (And you can use postscreen on port 25.)
Yeah, it would
Il 2021-11-05 09:36 Dominic Raferd ha scritto:
Why permit auth connections on port 25? Restrict them to 587 and/or
465 then you can specify subject rewriting for (all) mails arriving
via port 25. (And you can use postscreen on port 25.)
Yeah, it would be a very clean solution. However, we have
On 04/11/2021 21:51, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Dear all,
I was tasked to mark all messages coming from unauthenticated clients
(ie: incoming emails) with a specific subject line.
While subject rewrite is trivial per-se (via header_checks), I am having
big issues rewriting only selected messages. I f
