Wietse Venema wrote:
Below are the SMTP commands/responses, and the test-milter output
showing that the second "DATA" event is reported with the correct
queue ID.
OK, thanks! I'll take it up further with the milter authors.
-kgd
Below are the SMTP commands/responses, and the test-milter output
showing that the second "DATA" event is reported with the correct
queue ID.
Wietse
$ telnet 127.0.0.1 smtp
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
220-wzv.porcupine.org ESMTP Postfix
220 wzv.po
Kris Deugau:
> Mar 29 16:35:14 jessie64 postfix/smtpd[17537]: connect from
> localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Mar 29 16:35:27 jessie64 postfix/smtpd[17537]: 26F5E428A4:
> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Mar 29 16:36:02 jessie64 postfix/cleanup[17556]: 26F5E428A4:
> message-id=
> Mar 29 16:36:03 jessie64 mim
Wietse Venema wrote:
Kris Deugau:
I came across a bit of an information-passing glitch on a system that
uses a milter (MIMEDefang) to glue together complex filter policies.
MIMEDefang is configured to log sender, first recipient, Message-ID (if
any), and the queue ID, along with some filter res
Kris Deugau:
> I came across a bit of an information-passing glitch on a system that
> uses a milter (MIMEDefang) to glue together complex filter policies.
>
> MIMEDefang is configured to log sender, first recipient, Message-ID (if
> any), and the queue ID, along with some filter result data, fo
hyndavirap...@bel.co.in:
> I have enabled enable_long_queue_id = yes
That is a non-existent parameter.
> Now my doubt is how long, queueids will be unique, for 150 mails/min mail
> flow?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#enable_long_queue_ids
enable_long_queue_ids (default: no)
Enable
Am 2015-01-22 10:26, schrieb hyndavirap...@bel.co.in:
I have enabled enable_long_queue_id = yes
Now my doubt is how long, queueids will be unique, for 150 mails/min
mail
flow?
The id is build from the time and the file-id within the filesystem.
So each queue_id should be locally unique.
The
---
From: Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 2:37 PM
To: Nico Angenon
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Queue Id Collision
Nico Angenon:
Every thing goes right execpt that it happens ?Queue ID collision? :
for exemple in my logs :
The Queue ID is not reused before a message i
Nico Angenon:
> Every thing goes right execpt that it happens ?Queue ID collision? :
> for exemple in my logs :
The Queue ID is not reused before a message is removed from the queue.
Therefore there are no collisions.
If you need unique queue IDs, use Postfix 2.8 long queue IDs
Wietse
* Nico Angenon :
> Hello,
>
> I use Postfix 2.5.5 on a linux debian box and i'm trying to make some
> statistics for sasl authenticated user...
> the goal is to show them how many connexions to the server they have been
> made, how many mails they have sent, and show them the detected "from" a
Am 07.06.2012 14:26, schrieb Nico Angenon:
> I use Postfix 2.5.5
> Every thing goes right execpt that it happens “Queue ID collision”
> Is there any way to prevent this?
not with you terrible outdated version
recent is 2.9.3
enable_long_queue_ids = yes
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: 02 March 2012 16:55
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Queue ID with amavisd
>
> 2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 :
> > On F
2012/3/2 /dev/rob0 :
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
>> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> > * Chris :
>> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> >> > * Chris :
>> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> >> >> (mail-wi0-f174
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:32:18PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> > * Chris :
> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >> >>
> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> >> (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174])
* Chris :
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> > * Chris :
> >> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
> >> >>
> >> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >> >>
> >> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> >> [209.85.212.174])
> >> >>
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Chris :
>> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> > * Chris :
>> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
>> >>
>> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>> >>
>> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> >> [209.85.212.174])
>> >> by my.postfix-server.org
* Chris :
> 2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Chris :
> >> Hello Postfix Users :)
> >>
> >> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
> >>
> >> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> >> [209.85.212.174])
> >> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
2012/3/2 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Chris :
>> Hello Postfix Users :)
>>
>> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>>
>> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
>> [209.85.212.174])
>> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
>>
>> Where is the Postfix
* Chris :
> Hello Postfix Users :)
>
> I am using Postfix with amavisd.
>
> Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
> [209.85.212.174])
> by my.postfix-server.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS <<< no Queue ID
>
> Where is the Postfix queue ID?
It's logged by the second
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix.
> I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this
> content filter?
>
> It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow.
The queue ID is in the first RECEIVED: messag
On 12/15/2009 5:21 AM, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a pipe content filter for postfix.
I have a question, Is There a way to put the queue id of email, to this
content filter?
No.
It would be really useful to write a log file and trace the email flow.
If you write your
Michael Fernández M wrote:
Hi
Checking the logs i've noticed that i have the same Queue
Id for two connections... this could be?
I Ask because i was looking for some specific entry and i found more
than one entry
Here is the log
The QueueID is not, and is not intended to be, a
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:09 +0100, Martin Schmitt (Schmitt
Systemberatung) wrote:
> Michael,
>
> From http://www.postfix.org/faq.html:
>
> "Postfix names a queue file after its inode number and after the
> microsecond part of the time of day. Thus, if a queue file has a name
> based on someone el
Michael,
From http://www.postfix.org/faq.html:
"Postfix names a queue file after its inode number and after the
microsecond part of the time of day. Thus, if a queue file has a name
based on someone elses inode number there is a small chance that the
file name will collide with another queue file
ossible instances of the law re:
> legal status of an email & its authoritative tracking.
>
> Just curious. Thanks,
>
> Olivier
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Postfix users"
&g
o: "Postfix users"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Queue ID gets reused? Not unique?
> Durk Strooisma:
> > >> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions
using
> > >> the same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the
as
Durk Strooisma:
> >> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using
> >> the same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that
> >> queue IDs were generated randomly, which means they should be
> >> practically unique.
> >
> > Postfix behaves as documented. Pl
>> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using
>> the same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that
>> queue IDs were generated randomly, which means they should be
>> practically unique.
>
> Postfix behaves as documented. Please point out where the doc
Hi Victor,
Perfect, thanks a lot! This is the information I was looking for.
Durk
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Durk Strooisma wrote:
>
>> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using
>> the same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that
Durk Strooisma:
> Hi all,
>
> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
> same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
> were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
Postfix behaves as documented. Please poi
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Durk Strooisma wrote:
> I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
> same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
> were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
They
31 matches
Mail list logo
