On 7/30/2010 9:56 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 30/7/2010 4:14 μμ, Noel Jones wrote:
Please don't top-post. Please don't post HTML crap mail.
OK, Thanks.
No, bare user names won't match random domains. The lookup
search orders is documented in virtual(5).
Hmm, I tested in my installation a
On 30/7/2010 4:14 μμ, Noel Jones wrote:
Please don't top-post. Please don't post HTML crap mail.
OK, Thanks.
No, bare user names won't match random domains. The lookup search
orders is documented in virtual(5).
Hmm, I tested in my installation and found that using a bare user name
in
On 7/30/2010 3:34 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Please don't top-post. Please don't post HTML crap mail.
Thank you Noel for this clarification. I tested and you are
right - I had not realized it from the documentation:
virtual_alias_maps are always evaluated first, regardless what
are the hosted
Thank you Noel for this clarification. I tested and you are right - I
had not realized it from the documentation: virtual_alias_maps are
always evaluated first, regardless what are the hosted domains on the
server! So, if we put userx in virtual_alias_maps, this will match to
us...@all.domains
On 7/29/2010 8:07 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I have been setting up a new mail server for our organization
which has different mailservers, one for each subdomain. The
new server, will take over the whole organization using LDAP
and Postfix/Dovecot and things up to now are looking (almos
