On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 04:50 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Patrick Ben Koetter put forth on 7/22/2010 2:11 AM:
> > * Stan Hoeppner :
> >> Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
> >>> Ram:
> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> the mails to other s
Patrick Ben Koetter put forth on 7/22/2010 2:11 AM:
> * Stan Hoeppner :
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
>>> Ram:
One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
the mails to other servers.
Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I
* Stan Hoeppner :
> Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
> > Ram:
> >> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> >> the mails to other servers.
> >> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> >> be good to mount /var/spool/post
Wietse Venema put forth on 7/21/2010 2:22 PM:
> Ram:
>> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
>> the mails to other servers.
>> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
>> be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs partition.
>
Ram:
> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> the mails to other servers.
> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs partition.
You will lose all mail in the queue when the system cr
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:39:07AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> > the mails to other servers.
> > Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> > be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs
Ram:
> One server of ours just accepts the mails from clients and then relays
> the mails to other servers.
> Since there is almost no mail queued on the server , I think it is will
> be good to mount /var/spool/postfix on a tmpfs partition.
>
> The machine ( linux Centos 5.4 + postfix 2.7 ) ha
