On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the application-visible changes? If one relies on BIND
etc. for validation, where does DNSSEC affect the application?
Postfix uses the standard resolver library but these calls are
entirely encapsulated in a single module.
First of
Wietse Venema escribió:
> klondike:
>
>> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
>>
>>> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
>>> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
>>> cares about it.
>>> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
>
On Thursday 18 December 2008, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:42:55 +0100, Bernhard Fischer
>
> wrote:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> >
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Po
On Wednesday 17 December 2008, mouss wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer a écrit :
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> > (libv
On Wednesday 17 December 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
> klondike:
> > Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody
> > > really cares about it.
> > > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > Postfix uses res_search(3). DNSSEC would have to be supported by the
> > C-library stub resolver code, not Postfix.
>
> DNSSEC can be checked by the recursive reso
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Postfix uses res_search(3). DNSSEC would have to be supported by the
> C-library stub resolver code, not Postfix.
DNSSEC can be checked by the recursive resolver, which is sufficient in
most setups.
> DNSSEC is very complex. I rat
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:42:55 +0100, Bernhard Fischer
wrote:
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn
klondike:
> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> > (libval, libsres) I didn't find any d
Bernhard Fischer a écrit :
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0100, klondike wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
> > I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> > I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> > cares about it.
> > The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based o
Bernhard Fischer escribió:
> I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
> I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
> cares about it.
> The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
> (libval, libsres) I didn't find any download page for.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
